Manipulating the experienced onset of intention after action execution
- PMID: 17214565
- DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.81
Manipulating the experienced onset of intention after action execution
Abstract
Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we have tested the time needed for the perceived onset of spontaneous motor intention to be fully determined. We found that TMS applied over the presupplementary motor area after the execution of a simple spontaneous action shifted the perceived onset of the motor intention backward in time, and shifted the perceived time of action execution forward in time. The size of the effect was similar regardless of whether TMS was applied immediately after the action or 200 msec after. The results of three control studies suggest that this effect is time-limited, specific to modality, and also specific to the anatomical site of stimulation. We conclude that the perceived onset of intention depends, at least in part, on neural activity that takes place after the execution of action. A model, which is based on the mechanism of cue integration under the presence of noise, is offered to explain the results. The implications for the conscious control of spontaneous actions are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Action verbs and the primary motor cortex: a comparative TMS study of silent reading, frequency judgments, and motor imagery.Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):1915-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 Feb 2. Neuropsychologia. 2008. PMID: 18328510
-
Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex modulates response interference in a flanker task.Neurosci Lett. 2009 Feb 27;451(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.12.052. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Neurosci Lett. 2009. PMID: 19146925
-
Prior intention can locally tune inhibitory processes in the primary motor cortex: direct evidence from combined TMS-EEG.Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Sep;30(5):913-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06864.x. Epub 2009 Aug 27. Eur J Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19712104
-
Conscious motor intention emerges in the inferior parietal lobule.Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1004-11. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012. PMID: 22939569 Review.
-
Are Movement Preparation and Movement Initiation Truly Independent?J Neurosci. 2016 Jul 6;36(27):7076-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1135-16.2016. J Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27383585 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Delusional thinking and action binding in healthy individuals.Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 23;11(1):18932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97977-y. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34556707 Free PMC article.
-
What is the intention to move and when does it occur?Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Aug;151:105199. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105199. Epub 2023 Apr 27. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023. PMID: 37119992 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"Free will": are we all equal? A dynamical perspective of the conscious intention to move.Neurosci Conscious. 2015 Dec 31;2015(1):niv009. doi: 10.1093/nc/niv009. eCollection 2015. Neurosci Conscious. 2015. PMID: 30356930 Free PMC article.
-
Metacognition of agency: proximal action and distal outcome.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Sep;229(3):485-96. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3371-6. Epub 2013 Jan 29. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23358706
-
Moving a Rubber Hand that Feels Like Your Own: A Dissociation of Ownership and Agency.Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;6:40. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040. eCollection 2012. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22435056 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
