Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis
- PMID: 17240286
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60108-1
Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis
Erratum in
- Lancet. 2007 May 5;369(9572):1518
Abstract
Background: The effect of different classes of antihypertensive drugs on incident diabetes mellitus is controversial because traditional meta-analyses are hindered by heterogeneity across trials and the absence of trials comparing angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB). We therefore undertook a network meta-analysis, which accounts for both direct and indirect comparisons to assess the effects of antihypertensive agents on incident diabetes.
Methods: We undertook a systematic review up to Sept 15, 2006, and identified 48 randomised groups of 22 clinical trials with 143,153 participants who did not have diabetes at randomisation and so were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. 17 trials enrolled patients with hypertension, three enrolled high-risk patients, and one enrolled those with heart failure. The main outcome was the proportion of patients who developed diabetes.
Findings: Initial drug therapy used in the trials (and the number of patients with diabetes of the total number at risk) included: an ARB (1189 of 14,185, or 8.38%), ACE inhibitor (1618 of 22,941, or 7.05%), calcium-channel blocker (CCB, 2791 of 38,607, or 7.23%), placebo (1686 of 24,767, or 6.81%), beta blocker (2705 of 35,745, or 7.57%), or diuretic (998 of 18,699, or 5.34%). With an initial diuretic as the standard of comparison (eight groups), the degree of incoherence (a measure of how closely the entire network fits together) was small (omega=0.000017, eight degrees of freedom). The odds ratios were: ARB (five groups) 0.57 (95% CI 0.46-0.72, p<0.0001); ACE inhibitor (eight groups) 0.67 (0.56-0.80, p<0.0001); CCB (nine groups): 0.75 (0.62-0.90, p=0.002); placebo (nine groups) 0.77 (0.63-0.94, p = 0.009); beta blocker (nine groups) 0.90 (0.75-1.09, p=0.30). These estimates changed little in many sensitivity analyses.
Interpretation: The association of antihypertensive drugs with incident diabetes is therefore lowest for ARB and ACE inhibitors followed by CCB and placebo, beta blockers and diuretics in rank order.
Comment in
-
Review: angiotensin-receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have the lowest risk for diabetes.ACP J Club. 2007 May-Jun;146(3):73. ACP J Club. 2007. PMID: 17474682 No abstract available.
-
Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs.Lancet. 2007 May 5;369(9572):1513-1514. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60697-7. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17482972 No abstract available.
-
Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs.Lancet. 2007 May 5;369(9572):1514. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60698-9. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17482974 No abstract available.
-
Can a network meta-analysis be used to determine the effect of antihypertensive drugs on the risk of incident diabetes?Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jul;3(7):516-7. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0537. Epub 2007 May 29. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007. PMID: 17534271 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effects of RAS inhibitors on diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Apr;3(4):263-74. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70256-6. Epub 2015 Feb 6. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015. PMID: 25660574 Review.
-
Antihypertensive drugs and risk of cancer: network meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 324,168 participants from randomised trials.Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):65-82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70260-6. Epub 2010 Nov 29. Lancet Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21123111
-
Differential effects of antihypertensive drugs on new-onset diabetes?Curr Hypertens Rep. 2005 Aug;7(4):249-56. doi: 10.1007/s11906-005-0021-4. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2005. PMID: 16061042 Review.
-
New-onset diabetes and antihypertensive treatment.GMS Health Technol Assess. 2010 Mar 16;6:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/hta000081. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 21289876 Free PMC article.
-
Treating essential hypertension. The first choice is usually a thiazide diuretic.Prescrire Int. 2014 Sep;23(152):215-20. Prescrire Int. 2014. PMID: 25325125 Review.
Cited by
-
Dependent censoring bias assessment using inverse probability of censoring weights: Type 2 diabetes mellitus risk in patients initiating bisoprolol versus other antihypertensives in a Clinical Practice Research Datalink cohort study.J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Nov;13(11):e230027. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0027. Epub 2024 Nov 17. J Comp Eff Res. 2024. PMID: 39417364 Free PMC article.
-
Metabolic Syndrome, Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Vitamin D Levels in Children and Adolescents with Obesity.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 1;25(19):10599. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910599. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39408928 Free PMC article.
-
Childhood Cardiovascular Health, Obesity, and Some Related Disorders: Insights into Chronic Inflammation and Oxidative Stress.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 7;25(17):9706. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179706. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39273654 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Obesity and hypertension in children and adolescents.Clin Hypertens. 2024 Sep 1;30(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40885-024-00278-5. Clin Hypertens. 2024. PMID: 39217385 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medication-Induced Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Current Literature and Practical Management Strategies.Diabetes Ther. 2024 Sep;15(9):2001-2025. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01628-0. Epub 2024 Jul 31. Diabetes Ther. 2024. PMID: 39085746 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
