The Utilization during Mitotic Cell Division of Loci Controlling Meiotic Recombination and Disjunction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
- PMID: 17248870
- PMCID: PMC1213905
- DOI: 10.1093/genetics/90.3.531
The Utilization during Mitotic Cell Division of Loci Controlling Meiotic Recombination and Disjunction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Abstract
To inquire whether the loci identified by recombination-defective and disjunction-defective meiotic mutants in Drosophila are also utilized during mitotic cell division, the effects of 18 meiotic mutants (representing 13 loci) on mitotic chromosome stability have been examined genetically. To do this, meiotic-mutant-bearing flies heterozygous for recessive somatic cell markers were examined for the frequencies and types of spontaneous clones expressing the cell markers. In such flies, marked clones can arise via mitotic recombination, mutation, chromosome breakage, nondisjunction or chromosome loss, and clones from these different origins can be distinguished. In addition, meiotic mutants at nine loci have been examined for their effects on sensitivity to killing by UV and X rays.-Mutants at six of the seven recombination-defective loci examined (mei-9, mei-41, c(3)G, mei-W68, mei-S282, mei-352, mei-218) cause mitotic chromosome instability in both sexes, whereas mutants at one locus (mei-218) do not affect mitotic chromosome stability. Thus many of the loci utilized during meiotic recombination also function in the chromosomal economy of mitotic cells.-The chromosome instability produced by mei-41 alleles is the consequence of chromosome breakage, that of mei-9 alleles is primarily due to chromosome breakage and, to a lesser extent, to an elevated frequency of mitotic recombination, whereas no predominant mechanism responsible for the instability caused by c(3)G alleles is discernible. Since these three loci are defective in their responses to mutagen damage, their effects on chromosome stability in nonmutagenized cells are interpreted as resulting from an inability to repair spontaneous lesions. Both mei-W68 and mei-S282 increase mitotic recombination (and in mei-W68, to a lesser extent, chromosome loss) in the abdomen but not the wing. In the abdomen, the primary effect on chromosome stability occurs during the larval period when the abdominal histoblasts are in a nondividing (G2) state.-Mitotic recombination is at or above control levels in the presence of each of the recombination-defective meiotic mutants examined, suggesting that meiotic and mitotic recombination are under separate genetic control in Drosophila.-Of the six mutants examined that are defective in processes required for regular meiotic chromosome segregation, four (l(1)TW-6(cs), ca(nd), mei-S332, ord) affect mitotic chromosome behavior. At semi-restrictive temperatures, the cold sensitive lethal l(1)TW-6(cs) causes very frequent somatic spots, a substantial proportion of which are attributable to nondisjunction or loss. Thus, this locus specifies a function essential for chromosome segregation at mitosis as well as at the first meiotic division in females. The patterns of mitotic effects caused by ca(nd), mei-S332, and ord suggest that they may be leaky alleles at essential loci that specify functions common to meiosis and mitosis. Mutants at the two remaining loci (nod, pal) do not affect mitotic chromosome stability.
Similar articles
-
The effects of mutagen-sensitive mutants of Drosophila melanogaster in nonmutagenized cells.Genetics. 1979 Jul;92(3):833-47. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.3.833. Genetics. 1979. PMID: 119665 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophilia melanogaster.Genetics. 1972 Jun;71(2):255-86. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.2.255. Genetics. 1972. PMID: 4625747 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of recombination-deficient and repair-deficient loci on meiotic and mitotic chromosome behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.Basic Life Sci. 1980;15:189-208. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3842-0_13. Basic Life Sci. 1980. PMID: 6783029
-
Sex and the single cell. I. On the action of major loci affecting sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 1980 Feb;94(2):383-423. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.2.383. Genetics. 1980. PMID: 6771185 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Proliferation and dissemination of killer meiotic drive loci.Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2023 Oct;82:102100. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2023.102100. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2023. PMID: 37625205 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
REC, Drosophila MCM8, drives formation of meiotic crossovers.PLoS Genet. 2005 Sep;1(3):e40. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010040. PLoS Genet. 2005. PMID: 16189551 Free PMC article.
-
Cell competition removes segmental aneuploid cells from Drosophila imaginal disc-derived tissues based on ribosomal protein gene dose.Elife. 2021 Apr 13;10:e61172. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61172. Elife. 2021. PMID: 33847264 Free PMC article.
-
Nonrandom segregation of centromeres following mitotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3900-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3900. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986. PMID: 3086868 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms of chromosome orientation revealed by two meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster.Chromosoma. 1980;78(1):79-111. doi: 10.1007/BF00291909. Chromosoma. 1980. PMID: 6769652
-
Mismatch repair, gene conversion, and crossing-over in two recombination-defective mutants of Drosophila melanogaster.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Oct;79(19):5961-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.19.5961. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982. PMID: 6821126 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
