Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?
- PMID: 17254833
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002
Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?
Abstract
We present the case that language comprehension involves making simultaneous predictions at different linguistic levels and that these predictions are generated by the language production system. Recent research suggests that ease of comprehending predictable elements is due to prediction rather than facilitated integration, and that comprehension is accompanied by covert imitation. We argue that comprehenders use prediction and imitation to construct an "emulator", using the production system, and combine predictions with the input dynamically. Such a process helps to explain the rapidity of comprehension and the robust interpretation of ambiguous or noisy input. This framework is in line with a general trend in cognitive science to incorporate action systems into perceptual systems and has broad implications for understanding the links between language production and comprehension.
Similar articles
-
Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language.Brain Lang. 2004 May;89(2):385-92. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00355-9. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 15068922 No abstract available.
-
Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition.Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul;10(7):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 19. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006. PMID: 16784883
-
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension.Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):329-47. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495. Epub 2013 Jun 24. Behav Brain Sci. 2013. PMID: 23789620 Review.
-
Neural correlates of bimodal speech and gesture comprehension.Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):253-60. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00335-3. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 15010257
-
Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jun;61(6):825-50. doi: 10.1080/17470210701623605. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008. PMID: 18470815 Review.
Cited by
-
How tightly are production and comprehension interwoven?Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 26;4:238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00238. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23637694 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Similar Neural Correlates for Language and Sequential Learning: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.Lang Cogn Process. 2012 Jan 1;27(2):231-256. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.606666. Lang Cogn Process. 2012. PMID: 23678205 Free PMC article.
-
How Language Is Embodied in Bilinguals and Children with Specific Language Impairment.Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 17;7:1209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01209. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27582716 Free PMC article.
-
Bidirectional Connectivity Between Broca's Area and Wernicke's Area During Interactive Verbal Communication.Brain Connect. 2022 Apr;12(3):210-222. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0790. Epub 2021 Jul 26. Brain Connect. 2022. PMID: 34128394 Free PMC article.
-
Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 10;107(32):14425-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008662107. Epub 2010 Jul 26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010. PMID: 20660768 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
