A quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia
- PMID: 17310048
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00003
A quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia
Abstract
Background: Guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) for colorectal cancer screening are not specific for human hemoglobin and have low sensitivity. Automated-development, immunochemical FOBT is quality-controlled, is specific for human hemoglobin, and does not require diet restriction.
Objectives: To measure the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative immunochemical fecal hemoglobin measurements for detection of cancer and advanced adenoma in patients undergoing colonoscopy, to determine fecal hemoglobin thresholds that give the highest posttest probability for neoplasia, and to determine the number of immunochemical FOBTs needed.
Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study.
Setting: Ambulatory endoscopy services of the main health medical organization in Tel Aviv, Israel.
Participants: 1000 consecutive ambulatory patients--some asymptomatic but at increased risk for colorectal neoplasia and some symptomatic--who were undergoing elective colonoscopy and volunteered to prepare immunochemical FOBTs.
Intervention: The hemoglobin content of 3 bowel movements was measured, and the highest value was compared with colonoscopy findings.
Measurements: Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and 95% CIs of fecal hemoglobin measurements for clinically significant neoplasia, their relationship to the amount of fecal hemoglobin measured, and the number of immunochemical FOBTs performed.
Results: Colonoscopy identified clinically significant neoplasia in 91 patients (cancer in 17 patients and advanced adenomas in 74 patients). Using 3 immunochemical FOBTs and a hemoglobin threshold of 75 ng/mL of buffer, sensitivity and specificity were 94.1% (95% CI, 82.9% to 100.0%) and 87.5% (CI, 85.4% to 89.6%), respectively, for cancer and 67% (CI, 57.4% to 76.7%) and 91.4% (CI, 89.6% to 93.2%), respectively, for any clinically significant neoplasia.
Limitations: The fecal sampling method is standardized, but the sample size depends on fecal consistency. Some patients were tested while discontinuing aspirin and anticoagulant therapies. Study patients were at increased risk, and results might not apply to average-risk populations.
Conclusions: Quantitative immunochemical FOBT has good sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically significant neoplasia. Test performance in screening average-risk populations is not known.
Comment in
-
Quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood tests: is it time to go back to the future?Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):309-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00013. Ann Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17310056 No abstract available.
-
Quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for diagnosing colorectal neoplasia.Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):522-3; author reply 523. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00020. Ann Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17909220 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparative evaluation of immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal adenoma detection.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 3;150(3):162-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-3-200902030-00005. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19189905
-
Performance characteristics and evaluation of an automated-developed and quantitative, immunochemical, fecal occult blood screening test.Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2519-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00231.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005. PMID: 16279909
-
Comparison of a brush-sampling fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin with a sensitive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in detection of colorectal neoplasia.Cancer. 2006 Nov 1;107(9):2152-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22230. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16998938
-
Colorectal Cancer Screening With Traditional and New-generation Fecal Immunochemical Tests: A Critical Review of Fecal Occult Blood Tests.Anticancer Res. 2020 Feb;40(2):575-581. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13987. Anticancer Res. 2020. PMID: 32014898 Review.
-
[Chemical or immunological tests for the detection of fecal occult blood in colorectal cancer screening?].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;32(8):565-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.01.179. Epub 2009 Jul 3. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009. PMID: 19577340 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds: An International Survey of Population-Based Screening Programs.Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov 11. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08664-7. Online ahead of print. Dig Dis Sci. 2024. PMID: 39528850 Review.
-
Possibility of determining high quantitative fecal occult blood on stool surface using hyperspectral imaging.J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 23. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02163-2. Online ahead of print. J Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39441401
-
Development and validation of machine learning models for young-onset colorectal cancer risk stratification.NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Oct 22;8(1):239. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00719-2. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39438621 Free PMC article.
-
From-Toilet-to-Freezer: A Review on Requirements for an Automatic Protocol to Collect and Store Human Fecal Samples for Research Purposes.Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 28;11(10):2658. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102658. Biomedicines. 2023. PMID: 37893032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Appropriateness of fecal immunochemical testing utilization for colorectal cancer screening at an academic center.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Oct 6;36(1):20-23. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2123667. eCollection 2023. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022. PMID: 36578591 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical