Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty?

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 May;33(5):603-14. doi: 10.1177/0146167206292689. Epub 2007 Apr 17.

Abstract

The authors investigated whether students who selectively volunteer for a study of prison life possess dispositions associated with behaving abusively. Students were recruited for a psychological study of prison life using a virtually identical newspaper ad as used in the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE; Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973) or for a psychological study, an identical ad minus the words of prison life. Volunteers for the prison study scored significantly higher on measures of the abuse-related dispositions of aggressiveness, authoritarianism, Machiavellianism, narcissism, and social dominance and lower on empathy and altruism, two qualities inversely related to aggressive abuse. Although implications for the SPE remain a matter of conjecture, an interpretation in terms of person-situation interactionism rather than a strict situationist account is indicated by these findings. Implications for interpreting the abusiveness of American military guards at Abu Ghraib Prison also are discussed.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aggression
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Authoritarianism
  • Humans
  • Kentucky
  • Machiavellianism
  • Narcissism
  • Personality*
  • Prisons*
  • Research Design*
  • Research Subjects / psychology*
  • Selection Bias
  • Tennessee
  • Violence / psychology*
  • Volunteers