Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;18(3):254-60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01885.x.

Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning

Affiliations

Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning

Katharine Graf Estes et al. Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

The present experiments investigated how the process of statistically segmenting words from fluent speech is linked to the process of mapping meanings to words. Seventeen-month-old infants first participated in a statistical word segmentation task, which was immediately followed by an object-label-learning task. Infants presented with labels that were words in the fluent speech used in the segmentation task were able to learn the object labels. However, infants presented with labels consisting of novel syllable sequences (nonwords; Experiment 1) or familiar sequences with low internal probabilities (part-words; Experiment 2) did not learn the labels. Thus, prior segmentation opportunities, but not mere frequency of exposure, facilitated infants' learning of object labels. This work provides the first demonstration that exposure to word forms in a statistical word segmentation task facilitates subsequent word learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experiment 1: mean looking times (±1 SE) on same and switch test trials for infants in the word and nonword conditions.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Experiment 2: mean looking times (±1 SE) on same and switch test trials for infants in the word and part-word conditions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aslin RN, Saffran JR, Newport EL. Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science. 1998;9:321–324.
    1. Bates E, Dale P, Thal D. Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In: Fletcher P, MacWhinney B, editors. Handbook of child language. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell; 1995. pp. 96–151.
    1. Brent MR, Siskind JM. The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition. 2001;81:B33–B44. - PubMed
    1. Cohen LB, Atkinson DJ, Chaput HH. Habit 2000: A new program for testing infant perception and cognition (Version 2.2.5c) Austin: University of Texas; 2000. Computer software.
    1. Hollich G. Combining techniques to reveal emergent effects in infants' segmentation, word learning, and grammar. Language and Speech. 2006;49:3–19. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources