Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;174(3):683-696.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02031.x.

Conceptual analysis of methods applied to assessment of diversity within and distance between populations with asexual or mixed mode of reproduction

Affiliations
Free article

Conceptual analysis of methods applied to assessment of diversity within and distance between populations with asexual or mixed mode of reproduction

Evsey Kosman et al. New Phytol. 2007.
Free article

Abstract

Measures of diversity within populations, and distance between populations, are compared for organisms with an asexual or mixed mode of reproduction. Examples are drawn from studies of plant pathogenic fungi based on binary traits including presence/absence of DNA bands or virulence/avirulence to differential hosts. Commonly used measures of population diversity or genetic distance consider either genotype frequencies or allele frequencies. Kosman's diversity and distance measures are the most suitable for populations with an asexual or mixed mode of reproduction, because by considering genetic patterns of all individuals they take into account not just the genotype frequencies but also the genetic similarities between genotypes in the populations. The Kosman distance and diversity measures for populations can be calculated using different measures of dissimilarity between individuals (the simple mismatch, Jaccard and Dice coefficients of dissimilarity). Kosman's distances based on the simple mismatch and Jaccard dissimilarities are metrics. Comparisons of diversity indices for hypothetical examples as well as for actual data sets are presented to demonstrate that inferences from diversity analysis of populations can be driven by techniques of diversity and distance assessments and not only data driven.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adhikari TB, Mew TW, Leach JE. 1999. Genotypic and pathotypic diversity in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae in Nepal. Phytopathology 89: 687-694.
    1. Andrivon D, De Vallavieille-Pope C. 1995. Race diversity and complexity in selected populations of fungal biotrophic pathogens of cereals. Phytopathology 85: 897-905.
    1. Gale LR, Chen LF, Hernick CA, Takamura K, Kistler HC. 2002. Population analysis of Fusarium graminearum from wheat fields in eastern China. Phytopathology 92: 1315-1322.
    1. Goodwin SB, Spielman LJ, Matuszak JM, Bergeron SN, Fry WE. 1992. Clonal diversity and genetic differentiation of Phytophthora infestans populations in northern and central Mexico. Phytopathology 82: 955-961.
    1. Groth JV, Roelfs AP. 1987. The concept and measurement of phenotypic diversity in Puccinia graminis on wheat. Phytopathology 77: 1395-1399.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources