Residency directors' assessments of which selection criteria best predict the performances of foreign-born foreign medical graduates during internal medicine residencies

Acad Med. 1991 Nov;66(11):699-701. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199111000-00015.


In the summer of 1990, 102 directors of internal medicine residency programs from nine areas of the country with the largest numbers of foreign-born foreign medical graduates (FFMGs) were surveyed by mail to determine what criteria used to select FFMGs for residency positions best predicted performance. The directors felt that the most important predictors were performance on the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination in the Medical Sciences or the National Board of Medical Examiners examinations; performance during the interview; and postgraduate clinical experience in the United States. Recent graduation from medical school was felt to be a better predictor than postgraduate clinical experience in a foreign country. Seventy-three percent of the directors found letters of recommendation from a foreign country to be useless. The author suggests the results of this study may be useful to residency programs in evaluating FFMG applicants and to FFMGs in assessing their own credentials.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Educational Measurement
  • Forecasting
  • Foreign Medical Graduates / standards*
  • Humans
  • Internal Medicine / education*
  • Internship and Residency / standards*
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Physician Executives / statistics & numerical data*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United States