A sustained mortality benefit from screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm
- PMID: 17502630
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-10-200705150-00003
A sustained mortality benefit from screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm
Erratum in
- Ann Intern Med. 2007 Aug 7;147(3):216
Abstract
Background: Longer-term mortality benefit and cost-effectiveness for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening are uncertain.
Objective: To estimate the benefits, in terms of AAA-related and all-cause mortality, and cost-effectiveness of ultrasonography screening for AAA in a group that was invited to screening compared with a group that was not invited at a mean 7-year follow-up.
Design: Randomized trial.
Setting: 4 centers in the United Kingdom.
Patients: Population-based sample of 67,770 men age 65 to 74 years.
Intervention: Patients with an AAA detected at screening had surveillance and were offered surgery after predefined criteria were met.
Measurements: Mortality data were obtained after flagging on the national database. Unit costs obtained from large samples were applied to individual event data for the cost analysis.
Results: The hazard ratio was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.68) for AAA-related mortality in the group invited for screening. The rupture rate in men with normal results on initial ultrasonography has remained low: 0.54 rupture (CI, 0.25 to 1.02 ruptures) per 10 000 person-years. In terms of all-cause mortality, the observed hazard ratio was 0.96 (CI, 0.93 to 1.00). At the 7-year follow-up, cost-effectiveness was estimated at $19 500 (CI, $12,400 to $39,800) per life-year gained based on AAA-related mortality and $7600 (CI, $3300 to infinity) per life-year gained based on all-cause death. (All values are reported in U.S. dollars [U.K. 1 pound sterling = U.S. $1.58]).
Limitation: Inclusion of deaths from aortic aneurysm at an unspecified site, which may include some thoracic aortic aneurysms, may have underestimated the treatment effect.
Conclusions: These results from a large, pragmatic randomized trial show that the early mortality benefit of screening ultrasonography for AAA is maintained in the longer term and that the cost-effectiveness of screening improves over time. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial registration number: ISRCTN37381646.
Comment in
-
Evidence-based screening and management of abdominal aortic aneurysm.Ann Intern Med. 2007 May 15;146(10):749-50. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-10-200705150-00009. Ann Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17502636 No abstract available.
-
Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Dec;4(12):650-1. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1004. Epub 2007 Sep 11. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007. PMID: 17848920 No abstract available.
-
Screening ultrasonography for abdominal aortic aneurysm reduced mortality in older men and was cost-effective in the long term.ACP J Club. 2007 Nov-Dec;147(3):57. ACP J Club. 2007. PMID: 17975859 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study.BMJ. 2009 Jun 24;338:b2307. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2307. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19553269 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A systematic review of short-term vs long-term effectiveness of one-time abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men with ultrasound.J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):612-623. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.411. J Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 30037679 Review.
-
Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(43):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta22430. Health Technol Assess. 2018. PMID: 30132754 Free PMC article.
-
Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms.Br J Surg. 2007 Jun;94(6):696-701. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5780. Br J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17514666 Clinical Trial.
-
[Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms - a rational measure to prevent sudden rupture].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2016 Jul;141(14):1030-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-108998. Epub 2016 Jul 12. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2016. PMID: 27404935 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Use of radiological information system data in Clinical Portal database to screen for missed abdominal aortic aneurysms.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 May;105(5):422-427. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0115. Epub 2022 Oct 14. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023. PMID: 36239932 Free PMC article.
-
Small Diameter Cell-Free Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts: Biomaterials and Manufacture Techniques to Reach Suitable Mechanical Properties.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Aug 23;14(17):3440. doi: 10.3390/polym14173440. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36080517 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Economic Evaluations Informed Exclusively by Real World Data: A Systematic Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1171. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041171. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32059593 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Population-Based Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 10;15(12):2805. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122805. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30544688 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: current practice, challenges and controversies.Br J Radiol. 2018 Oct;91(1090):20170306. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170306. Epub 2018 Apr 5. Br J Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29582667 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
