Cold knife versus laser cone biopsy for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix--a comparison of management and outcome

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 Jan-Feb;18(1):116-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00976.x. Epub 2007 May 15.

Abstract

Eighty-two patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix managed at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital were reviewed and data were collected on those treated by cold knife cone biopsy (n= 38) and laser cone biopsy (n= 44). No differences were found in patient age, cytologic or referral history, or outcomes. Having laser excision did not compromise margin status or subsequent management. Invasive disease was found in 24 patients, 16 of whom were managed conservatively with good outcome. Twelve of these were in the laser cone group. In those patients from both groups managed conservatively, there was only one recurrence, squamous preinvasive disease after 8 years. Laser cone biopsy is as effective as cold knife cone biopsy with no compromise of outcome for these patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / pathology
  • Adenocarcinoma / surgery*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biopsy
  • Carcinoma in Situ / pathology
  • Carcinoma in Situ / surgery*
  • Conization / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laser Therapy*
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / pathology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / pathology
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / surgery*