Issues in the registration of clinical trials
- PMID: 17507347
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.19.2112
Issues in the registration of clinical trials
Abstract
Public concerns about the perils associated with incomplete or delayed reporting of results from clinical trials has heightened interest in trial registries and results databases. Here we review the current status of trial registration efforts and the challenges in developing a comprehensive system of trial registration and reporting of results. ClinicalTrials.gov, the largest trial registry with 36 249 trials from approximately 140 countries, has procedures in place to help ensure that records are valid and informative. Key challenges include the need to minimize inadvertent duplicate registrations, to ensure that interventions have unambiguous names, and to have a search engine that identifies all trials that meet a user's specifications. Recent policy initiatives have called for the development of a database of trial results. Several issues confound the implementation of such a database, including the lack of an accepted format or process for providing summaries of trial results to the public and concerns about disseminating data in the absence of independent scientific review.
Comment in
-
Clinical trial registries.JAMA. 2007 Oct 3;298(13):1514; author reply 1515. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.13.1514-b. JAMA. 2007. PMID: 17911493 No abstract available.
-
Clinical trial registries.JAMA. 2007 Oct 3;298(13):1514; author reply 1515. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.13.1514-a. JAMA. 2007. PMID: 17911494 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues.N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):852-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012065. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21366476 Free PMC article.
-
The ClinicalTrials.gov results database.N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 2;364(22):2169; author reply 2170. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1103910. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21631346 No abstract available.
-
Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144. Epub 2009 Sep 8. PLoS Med. 2009. PMID: 19901971 Free PMC article.
-
Registration and design alterations of clinical trials in critical care: a cross-sectional observational study.Intensive Care Med. 2014 May;40(5):700-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3250-7. Epub 2014 Apr 16. Intensive Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24737256 Review.
-
Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;72(10):1283-1288. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2112-3. Epub 2016 Aug 2. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27484242 Review.
Cited by 61 articles
-
Clinical Trials for Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis: A Cross-Sectional Study of Registered Trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 15;10:1629. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01629. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33042806 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of COVID-19 Clinical Trials in China Based on the Registration Data on ChiCTR and ClinicalTrials.gov.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 May 29;14:2159-2164. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S254354. eCollection 2020. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020. PMID: 32581514 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hidden duplicates: 10s or 100s of Indian trials, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, have not been registered in India, as required by law.PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234925. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32559240 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting results in U.S. clinical trials for obstructive sleep apnea and insomnia: How transparent are they?Sleep Health. 2020 Aug;6(4):529-533. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.11.009. Epub 2020 Mar 14. Sleep Health. 2020. PMID: 32179065 Review.
-
Trends of clinical trials from 2014 to 2016 in South Korea.Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;26(4):172-176. doi: 10.12793/tcp.2018.26.4.172. Epub 2018 Dec 19. Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 32055572 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
