Impact of different methods of feedback to clinicians after postprescription antimicrobial review based on the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention's 12 Steps to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance Among Hospitalized Adults
- PMID: 17520534
- DOI: 10.1086/518345
Impact of different methods of feedback to clinicians after postprescription antimicrobial review based on the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention's 12 Steps to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance Among Hospitalized Adults
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate (1) the framework of the 12 Steps to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance Among Hospitalized Adults that is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance in Healthcare Settings, with regard to steps addressing antimicrobial use; and (2) methods of feedback to clinicians regarding antimicrobial use after postprescription review.
Design: Prospective intervention to identify and modify inappropriate antimicrobial therapy.
Setting: A 1,000-bed, tertiary care teaching hospital.
Patients: Inpatients in selected medicine and surgery units receiving broad-spectrum antimicrobials for 48-72 hours.
Interventions: We created a computer-based clinical-event detection system that automatically identified inpatients taking broad-spectrum and "reserve" antimicrobials for 48-72 hours. Although prior approval was required for initial administration of broad-spectrum and reserve antimicrobials, once approval was obtained, therapy with the antimicrobials could be continued indefinitely at the discretion of the treating clinician. Therapy that was ongoing at 48-72 hours was reviewed by an infectious diseases pharmacist or physician, and when indicated feedback was provided to clinicians to modify or discontinue therapy. Feedback was provided via a direct telephone call, a note on the front of the medical record, or text message sent to the clinician's pager. The acceptance rate of feedback was recorded and recommendations were categorized according to the 12 steps recommended by the CDC.
Results: Interventions were recommended for 334 (30%) of 1,104 courses of antimicrobial therapy reviewed. A total of 87% of interventions fit into one of the CDC's 12 steps of prevention: 39% into step 3 ("target the pathogen"), 1% into step 4 ("access experts"), 3% into steps 7 and 8 ("treat infection, not colonization or contamination"), 18% into step 9 ("say ;no' to vancomycin"), and 26% into step 10 ("stop treatment when no infection"). The rate of compliance with recommendations to improve antimicrobial use was 72%. No differences in compliance were seen with the different methods of feedback.
Conclusions: Nearly one-third of antimicrobial courses did not follow the CDC's recommended 12 steps for prevention of antimicrobial resistance. Clinicians demonstrated high compliance with following suggestions made after postprescription review, suggesting that it is a useful approach to decreasing and improving antimicrobial use among inpatients.
Similar articles
-
Improving antimicrobial use in the hospital setting by providing usage feedback to prescribing physicians.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;27(4):378-82. doi: 10.1086/503336. Epub 2006 Mar 29. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16622816
-
Point prevalence survey of antimicrobial utilization in the cardiac and pediatric critical care unit.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;14(6):e280-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31828a846d. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23823209
-
Evaluation of postprescription review and feedback as a method of promoting rational antimicrobial use: a multicenter intervention.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):374-80. doi: 10.1086/664771. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22418633
-
[Programs for optimizing the use of antibiotics (PROA) in Spanish hospitals: GEIH-SEIMC, SEFH and SEMPSPH consensus document].Farm Hosp. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):33.e1-30. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Dec 1. Farm Hosp. 2012. PMID: 22137161 Spanish.
-
[For rational use of antibiotics in the hospital].Rev Med Brux. 2001 Feb;22(1):15-25. Rev Med Brux. 2001. PMID: 11252901 Review. French.
Cited by
-
A prospective cluster trial to increase antibiotic prescription quality in seven non-ICU wards.GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2023 Jun 5;18:Doc14. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000440. eCollection 2023. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2023. PMID: 37405250 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting medication errors associated with the use of beta-lactams in the Russian Pharmacovigilance database.BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40360-020-00470-x. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2021. PMID: 33419474 Free PMC article.
-
Infection control and other stewardship strategies in late onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and localized infection in the neonatal intensive care unit.Semin Perinatol. 2020 Dec;44(8):151326. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151326. Epub 2020 Oct 12. Semin Perinatol. 2020. PMID: 33158599 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a Hospital-Based Post-Prescription Review and Feedback Pilot in Kathmandu, Nepal.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Oct;101(4):923-928. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0724. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019. PMID: 31392949 Free PMC article.
-
What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 7;18(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0661-3. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018. PMID: 30404638 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous