Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology

CBE Life Sci Educ. Summer 2007;6(2):132-9. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0194.

Abstract

We tested five course designs that varied in the structure of daily and weekly active-learning exercises in an attempt to lower the traditionally high failure rate in a gateway course for biology majors. Students were given daily multiple-choice questions and answered with electronic response devices (clickers) or cards. Card responses were ungraded; clicker responses were graded for right/wrong answers or participation. Weekly practice exams were done as an individual or as part of a study group. Compared with previous versions of the same course taught by the same instructor, students in the new course designs performed better: There were significantly lower failure rates, higher total exam points, and higher scores on an identical midterm. Attendance was higher in the clicker versus cards section; attendance and course grade were positively correlated. Students did better on clicker questions if they were graded for right/wrong answers versus participation, although this improvement did not translate into increased scores on exams. In this course, achievement increases when students get regular practice via prescribed (graded) active-learning exercises.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biology / education*
  • Biology / standards*
  • Curriculum
  • Educational Measurement*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Models, Educational
  • Problem-Based Learning / methods*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Seasons
  • Students*