The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework
- PMID: 17550668
- PMCID: PMC2078188
The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework
Abstract
Background: The existence of health inequalities between least and most socially deprived areas is now well established.
Aim: To use Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) indicators to explore the characteristics of primary care in deprived communities.
Design of study: Two-year study.
Setting: Primary care in England.
Method: QOF data were obtained for each practice in England in 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 and linked with census derived social deprivation data (Index of Multiple Deprivation scores 2004), national urbanicity scores and a database of practice characteristics. Data were available for 8480 practices in 2004-2005 and 8264 practices in 2005-2006. Comparisons were made between practices in the least and most deprived quintiles.
Results: The difference in mean total QOF score between practices in least and most deprived quintiles was 64.5 points in 2004-2005 (mean score, all practices, 959.9) and 30.4 in 2005-2006 (mean, 1012.6). In 2005-2006, the QOF indicators displaying the largest differences between least and most deprived quintiles were: recall of patients not attending appointments for injectable neuroleptics (79 versus 58%, respectively), practices opening > or =45 hours/week (90 versus 74%), practices conducting > or = 12 significant event audits in previous 3 years (93 versus 81%), proportion of epileptics who were seizure free > or = 12 months (77 versus 65%) and proportion of patients taking lithium with serum lithium within therapeutic range (90 versus 78%). Geographical differences were less in group and training practices.
Conclusions: Overall differences between primary care quality indicators in deprived and prosperous communities were small. However, shortfalls in specific indicators, both clinical and non-clinical, suggest that focused interventions could be applied to improve the quality of primary care in deprived areas.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004-5.BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Nov 13;7:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-68. BMC Fam Pract. 2006. PMID: 17096861 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of social deprivation on blood pressure monitoring and control in England: a survey of data from the quality and outcomes framework.BMJ. 2008 Oct 28;337:a2030. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2030. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18957697 Free PMC article.
-
Primary care funding, contract status, and outcomes: an observational study.Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Nov;56(532):825-9. Br J Gen Pract. 2006. PMID: 17132348 Free PMC article.
-
A review of the public health impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework.Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(2):133-8. Qual Prim Care. 2010. PMID: 20529475 Review.
-
Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS.Br J Gen Pract. 2010 May;60(574):e213-20. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X501859. Br J Gen Pract. 2010. PMID: 20423576 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Cancer detection via primary care urgent referral and association with practice characteristics: a retrospective cross-sectional study in England from 2009/2010 to 2018/2019.Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Oct 28;71(712):e826-e835. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.1030. Print 2021 Nov. Br J Gen Pract. 2021. PMID: 34544690 Free PMC article.
-
Infection-related complications after common infection in association with new antibiotic prescribing in primary care: retrospective cohort study using linked electronic health records.BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):e041218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041218. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33452190 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Equity in Health Financing Using Benefit Incidence Analysis: A Framework for Accounting for Quality of Care.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Dec;18(6):759-766. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00597-2. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020. PMID: 32567036 Free PMC article.
-
Seizure First Aid Training For people with Epilepsy (SAFE) frequently attending emergency departments and their significant others: results of a UK multi-centre randomised controlled pilot trial.BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 16;10(4):e035516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035516. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32303515 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Developing patient-centred, feasible alternative care for adult emergency department users with epilepsy: protocol for the mixed-methods observational 'Collaborate' project.BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e031696. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031696. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31678950 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials