Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 11 (3), 171-81

Impact of CYP2D6 Genetic Polymorphism on Tramadol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Affiliations

Impact of CYP2D6 Genetic Polymorphism on Tramadol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Siew Hua Gan et al. Mol Diagn Ther.

Abstract

Background and objective: Tramadol is metabolized by the highly polymorphic enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6. Patients with different CYP2D6 genotypes may respond differently to tramadol in terms of pain relief and adverse events. In this study, we compare the pharmacokinetics and effects of tramadol in Malaysian patients with different genotypes to establish the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of tramadol.

Study design and setting: All patients received an intravenous dose of tramadol 100mg as their first postoperative analgesic. Blood was sampled at 0 minutes and subsequently at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 hours for serum tramadol and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Patients were genotyped for CYP2D6*1, *3, *4, *5, *9, *10, and *17 alleles and duplication of the gene by means of an allele-specific PCR. Pain was measured using the Visual Analog Scales, and adverse effects were recorded.

Results: About half of the patients had the wild-type allele (CYP2D6*1), with the 'Asian'CYP2D6*10 allele accounting for most of the rest (40%). None of the genotypes predicted poor metabolism. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were intermediate metabolizers (IM) and 2.9% were ultra-rapid (UM) metabolizers; the remaining 70% were extensive metabolizers (EM). The mean total clearance (CL) predicted by the model was lower (19 L/h) and the half-life longer (5.9 hours) than those reported in Western populations. This may due to the high frequency of the CYP2D6*10 allele amongst Malaysian patients. The UM and EM groups had 2.6- and 1.3-times faster CL, respectively, than the IM. CL was 16, 18, 23, and 42 L/h while mean half-lives were 7.1, 6.8, 5.6, and 3.8 hours among the IM, EM1, EM2, and UM groups, respectively. However, the analgesic effects of tramadol were not measured adequately among the postoperative patients to establish its full therapeutic effects. There were significant differences in the adverse-effect profiles amongst the various genotype groups, with the IM group experiencing more adverse effects than the EM, and the EM having more adverse effects than the UM.

Conclusion: CYP2D6 activity may play an important role in determining the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and in predicting its adverse effects. If these results can be confirmed in a larger population, genotyping may be an important tool in determining the dose of tramadol.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 21 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Lancet. 1990 Sep 1;336(8714):529-32 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;51(5):395-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Dec;42(6):713-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004 May;75(5):386-93 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Jan;260(1):275-85 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback