Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2007 Sep;132(3):984-90.
doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0793. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

Differential diagnosis of ground-glass opacity nodules: CT number analysis by three-dimensional computerized quantification

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Differential diagnosis of ground-glass opacity nodules: CT number analysis by three-dimensional computerized quantification

Koei Ikeda et al. Chest. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To differentiate among atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), and adenocarcinoma showing ground-glass opacity (GGO) on CT scans, we conducted a study to determine the optimal parameter on CT number analysis using three-dimensional (3D) computerized quantification.

Methods: From the CT numbers of GGO lesions obtained by 3D computerized quantification, CT number histogram pattern, peak CT number on the histogram, mean CT number, and the 5th to 95th percentile CT numbers were analyzed to determine the optimal parameter for differentiation among AAH (n = 10), BAC (n = 21), and adenocarcinoma (n = 12).

Results: While the CT number histogram showed one peak in all 10 of the AAH lesions (100%), it showed two peaks in 8 of 21 BAC lesions (38%), and in 5 of 12 adenocarcinoma lesions (42%). For differentiation between AAH and BAC, the 75th percentile CT number with a cutoff value of -584 Hounsfield units (HU) was optimal, with a sensitivity of 0.90 and a specificity of 0.81. For differentiation between BAC and adenocarcinoma, a mean CT number with a cutoff value of -472 HU was optimal, with a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.81.

Conclusions: From the analysis of CT numbers of GGO lesions obtained by 3D computerized quantification, we conclude the following: (1) two peaks on the CT number histogram can rule out AAH; (2) the 75th percentile is the optimal CT number for differentiating between AAH and BAC; and (3) the mean CT number is the optimal CT number for differentiating between BAC and adenocarcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Great data, but how do we use it?
    Detterbeck F, Nomori H, Ikeda K, Awai K, Mori T, Kawanaka K, Yamashita Y. Detterbeck F, et al. Chest. 2008 Mar;133(3):827-8; author reply 827-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2489. Chest. 2008. PMID: 18321915 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types