Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 18 (1), 1-6

Second Report (1998-2006) of the International Registry of Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation


Second Report (1998-2006) of the International Registry of Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation

Marco Lanzetta et al. Transpl Immunol.


Since May 2002 all groups performing hand transplantations have supplied detailed information to the International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation. This report provides a review of all hand transplants performed to date. From September 1998 to February 2006 eighteen male patients underwent 24 hand/forearm/digit transplantations (eleven unilateral and four bilateral hand transplantations, two bilateral forearm transplantations, one thumb transplantation). The level of amputation was mostly at the distal forearm or wrist. Patient average age was 32. Time since hand loss ranged from 2 months to 22 years. Immunosuppressive therapy included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, rapamycin and steroids; polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies were used for induction. Topical immunosuppression was administered in some patients. Follow-up period ranged from 34 to 85 months. Patient survival was 100%. Graft survival was 100% at 1 and 2 years. Two cases of graft failure at a later date occurred and were caused by severe inflammation and progressive rejection in a non-compliant patient. In addition, 6 hands were lost due to a rejection process as the Chinese recipients did not take their immunosuppressive treatment. These failures were communicated in January 2006. Acute rejection episodes occurred in 12 patients within the first year. Rejection was completely reversible in all compliant patients. Side-effects included opportunistic infections and metabolic complications. No life-threatening complications or malignancies were reported. As it would have been very difficult to analyse transplantation functional results in a standardized way, the Registry has performed a functional score system. All patients had achieved protective sensation and in 17 of them also discriminative sensation. Extrinsic and intrinsic muscle recovery enabled patients to perform most daily activities and 90% of the recipients returned to work, and improved manual skills allowed them not only to resume their previous jobs but also, in some cases, to find more suitable employment. Fifteen recipients reported an improvement of their quality of life and we evaluated as a very important point as patient satisfaction and well-being are mandatory goals of hand transplantation.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 24 PubMed Central articles

  • Outcomes After Hand and Upper Extremity Transplantation
    JT Shores et al. J Mater Sci Mater Med 28 (5), 72. PMID 28361279. - Review
    Hand and upper extremity transplantation (HUET) has emerged as the most frequently performed reconstructive procedure in the burgeoning field of vascularized composite al …
  • Face Transplantation: Anesthetic Challenges
    A Dalal. World J Transplant 6 (4), 646-649. PMID 28058213. - Review
    Face transplantation is a complex vascular composite allotransplantation (VCA) surgery. It involves multiple types of tissue, such as bone, muscles, blood vessels, nerves …
  • Experimental Forelimb Allotransplantation in Canine Model
    SH Hong et al. Biomed Res Int 2016, 1495710. PMID 27597952.
    As reconstructive transplantation is gaining popularity as a viable alternative for upper limb amputees, it is becoming increasingly important for plastic surgeons to ren …
  • Key Psychosocial Challenges in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
    M Kumnig et al. World J Transplant 6 (1), 91-102. PMID 27011907. - Review
    Psychosocial factors are important elements in the assessment and follow-up care for vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) and require multidisciplinary evalua …
  • Surgical-allogeneic Facial Reconstruction: Facial Transplants
    MC Goiato et al. J Dent (Tehran) 11 (6), 733-9. PMID 25628706. - Case Reports
    Several factors including cancer, malformations and traumas may cause large facial mutilation. These functional and aesthetic deformities negatively affect the psychologi …
See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources