Practice size, caseload, deprivation and quality of care of patients with coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke in primary care: national cross-sectional study
- PMID: 17597518
- PMCID: PMC1919365
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-96
Practice size, caseload, deprivation and quality of care of patients with coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke in primary care: national cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Reports of higher quality care by higher-volume secondary care providers have fuelled a shift of services from smaller provider units to larger hospitals and units. In the United Kingdom, most patients are managed in primary care. Hence if larger practices provide better quality of care; this would have important implications for the future organization of primary care services. We examined the association between quality of primary care for cardiovascular disease achieved by general practices in England and Scotland by general practice caseload, practice size and area based deprivation measures, using data from the New General Practitioner (GP) Contract.
Methods: We analyzed data from 8,970 general practices with a total registered population of 55,522,778 patients in England and Scotland. We measured practice performance against 26 cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease, left ventricular disease, and stroke) Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) indicators for patients on cardiovascular disease registers and linked this with data on practice characteristics and census data.
Results: Despite wide variations in practice list sizes and deprivation, the prevalence of was remarkably consistent, (coronary heart disease, left ventricular dysfunction, hypertension and cerebrovascular disease was 3.7%; 0.45%; 11.4% and 1.5% respectively). Achievement in quality of care for cardiovascular disease, as measured by QOF, was consistently high regardless of caseload or size with a few notable exceptions: practices with larger list sizes, higher cardiovascular disease caseloads and those in affluent areas had higher achievement of indicators requiring referral for further investigation. For example, small practices achieved lower scores 71.4% than large practices 88.6% (P < 0.0001) for referral for exercise testing and specialist assessment of patients with newly diagnosed angina.
Conclusion: The volume-outcome relationship found in hospital settings is not seen between practices in the UK in management of cardiovascular disorders in primary care. Further work is warranted to explain apparently poorer quality achievement in some aspects of cardiovascular management relating to initial diagnosis and management among practices in deprived areas, smaller practices and those with a smaller caseload.
Similar articles
-
Differences in the quality of primary medical care services by remoteness from urban settlements.Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec;16(6):446-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020875. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007. PMID: 18055889 Free PMC article.
-
The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004-5.BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Nov 13;7:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-68. BMC Fam Pract. 2006. PMID: 17096861 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in the quality of primary medical care for CVD and diabetes across the NHS: evidence from the quality and outcomes framework.BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 May 29;7:74. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-74. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17535429 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
A review of the public health impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework.Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(2):133-8. Qual Prim Care. 2010. PMID: 20529475 Review.
Cited by
-
The Association Between Panel Size and Health Outcomes of Patients with Hypertension in Urban China: a Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3402-3409. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06681-0. Epub 2021 Mar 10. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33689117
-
Impact of a Comprehensive Guideline Dissemination Strategy on Diabetes Diagnostic Test Rates: an Interrupted Time Series.J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2662-2667. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05747-9. Epub 2020 Mar 10. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32157647 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic inequality in medication persistence in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease - A population-wide electronic cohort study.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 9;13(3):e0194081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194081. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29522561 Free PMC article.
-
[Indicators of an increase in dementia diagnosis rate in primary care].Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jul;51(5):517-522. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1336-x. Epub 2017 Nov 2. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018. PMID: 29098382 German.
-
Equity in healthcare for coronary heart disease, Wales (UK) 2004-2010: A population-based electronic cohort study.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0172618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172618. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28301496 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Halm EA. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:511–520. - PubMed
