A red blood cell agglutination D-dimer test to exclude deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy
- PMID: 17679704
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-3-200708070-00005
A red blood cell agglutination D-dimer test to exclude deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy
Abstract
Background: D-Dimer testing is often used with compression ultrasonography for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in nonpregnant patients. The D-dimer test is highly sensitive, and a negative result can obviate the need for further testing for DVT. This test has not been studied for DVT diagnosis in pregnancy because its specificity was deemed too poor.
Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity and assess the utility of the SimpliRED assay (Agen Biomedical, Brisbane, Australia) for the diagnosis of DVT in pregnant women.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: 5 tertiary university-affiliated Canadian hospitals providing care to obstetric patients.
Patients: 149 consecutive pregnant women with suspected DVT who presented to 1 of the participating centers over 5 years.
Intervention: Participating women were tested with compression leg ultrasonography (single or serially on days 0, 3, and 7) and received 3 months' clinical follow-up for the presence or absence of DVT. Whole blood was tested with the SimpliRED assay at initial presentation, and results were correlated with ultrasonography and clinical findings for the presence or absence of DVT.
Measurements: The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the SimpliRED assay were calculated, along with the prevalence of false-positive SimpliRED assay results (with 95% CIs).
Results: The prevalence of DVT in the cohort was 8.7% (95% CI, 5.2% to 14.4%). The sensitivity of the SimpliRED assay was 100% (CI, 77% to 100% [13 of 13 patients]), the specificity was 60% (CI, 52% to 68% [81 of 135]), and the negative predictive value was 100% (CI, 95% to 100% [81 of 81]). The SimpliRED assay was positive in 0% (CI, 0% to 60%), 24% (CI, 14% to 37%), and 51% (CI, 40% to 61%) of women in the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively, among pregnant patients in whom DVT was not diagnosed.
Limitations: The prevalence of DVT in the cohort was low, resulting in wide CIs. The clinician's previous impression was used to determine pretest probability in the absence of a validated clinical prediction rule for pregnant women.
Conclusion: The SimpliRED assay may be useful in pregnancy because a normal result excludes DVT and occurs frequently enough to be clinically helpful.
Comment in
-
D-dimer testing in pregnancy: clinically useful, but at what cost?Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):484; author reply 484-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00020. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18347359 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Predicting deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy: out in "LEFt" field?Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 21;151(2):85-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-00004. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19620161
-
A negative SimpliRED D-dimer assay result does not exclude the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus in emergency department patients.Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Feb;35(2):121-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70130-2. Ann Emerg Med. 2000. PMID: 10650228 Clinical Trial.
-
A critical appraisal of non-invasive diagnosis and exclusion of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: how many tests do we need?Int Angiol. 2005 Mar;24(1):27-39. Int Angiol. 2005. PMID: 15876996 Review.
-
The Wells rule and D-dimer for the diagnosis of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis.J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Nov;10(11):2264-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04895.x. J Thromb Haemost. 2012. PMID: 22906051
-
Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006 Oct;32(7):678-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951296. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006. PMID: 17024595 Review.
Cited by
-
A review of the use of CT pulmonary angiography in pregnant and postpartum women at an academic centre.Obstet Med. 2024 Oct 26:1753495X241290551. doi: 10.1177/1753495X241290551. Online ahead of print. Obstet Med. 2024. PMID: 39553164 Free PMC article.
-
Acute inferior vena cava thromboembolism in pregnancy.BMJ Case Rep. 2024 Jan 16;17(1):e258667. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-258667. BMJ Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38232997
-
Accurate diagnosis of isolated iliac vein thrombosis in third trimester pregnancy with clues on great saphenous vein reflux: a case report and review of literature.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Feb 8;23(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05412-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 36755217 Free PMC article. Review.
-
D-dimer to rule out venous thromboembolism during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Thromb Haemost. 2021 Oct;19(10):2454-2467. doi: 10.1111/jth.15432. Epub 2021 Jul 20. J Thromb Haemost. 2021. PMID: 34161671 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Jun 2;10(6):365. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10060365. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32498355 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical