Dentine sealing provided by smear layer/smear plugs vs. adhesive resins/resin tags

Eur J Oral Sci. 2007 Aug;115(4):321-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00465.x.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of five experimental resins, which ranged from hydrophobic to hydrophilic blends, to seal acid-etched dentine saturated with water or ethanol. The experimental resins (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) were evaluated as neat bonding agents (100% resin) or as solutions solvated with absolute ethanol (70% resin/30% ethanol). Fluid conductance was measured at 20 cm H(2)O hydrostatic pressure after sound dentine surfaces were: (i) covered with a smear layer; (ii) acid-etched; or (iii) bonded with neat or solvated resins, which were applied to acid-etched dentine saturated with water or ethanol. In general, the fluid conductance of resin-bonded dentine was significantly higher than that of smear layer-covered dentine. However, when the most hydrophobic neat resins (R1 and R2) were applied to acid-etched dentine saturated with ethanol, the fluid conductance was as low as that produced by smear layers. The fluid conductance of resin-bonded dentine saturated with ethanol was significantly lower than for resin bonded to water-saturated dentine, except for resin R4. Application of more hydrophobic resins may provide better sealing of acid-etched dentine if the substrate is saturated with ethanol instead of with water.

Publication types

  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acid Etching, Dental / methods
  • Acrylic Resins / chemistry*
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Dentin / chemistry*
  • Dentin / ultrastructure
  • Dentin Permeability*
  • Humans
  • Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
  • Linear Models
  • Pit and Fissure Sealants / chemistry*
  • Smear Layer*
  • Water

Substances

  • Acrylic Resins
  • Pit and Fissure Sealants
  • Water