Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis

Obes Rev. 2007 Sep;8(5):385-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00397.x.

Abstract

Despite numerous studies reporting an increased risk of cesarean delivery among overweight or obese compared with normal weight women, the magnitude of the association remains uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of the current literature to provide a quantitative estimate of this association. We identified studies from three sources: (i) a PubMed search of relevant articles published between January 1980 and September 2005; (ii) reference lists of publications selected from the search; and (iii) reference lists of review articles published between 2000 and 2005. We included cohort designed studies that reported obesity measures reflecting pregnancy body mass, had a normal weight comparison group, and presented data allowing a quantitative measurement of risk. We used a Bayesian random effects model to perform the meta-analysis and meta-regression. Thirty-three studies were included. The unadjusted odd ratios of a cesarean delivery were 1.46 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.60], 2.05 (95% CI: 1.86-2.27) and 2.89 (95% CI: 2.28-3.79) among overweight, obese and severely obese women, respectively, compared with normal weight pregnant women. The meta-regression found no evidence that these estimates were affected by selected study characteristics. Our findings provide a quantitative estimate of the risk of cesarean delivery associated with high maternal body mass.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Body Mass Index
  • Cesarean Section / statistics & numerical data*
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Obesity / complications*
  • Obstetric Labor Complications / etiology*
  • Obstetric Labor Complications / surgery
  • Odds Ratio
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors