In canine coronary artery preparations, the proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR(2)) activating peptides (PAR(2)-APs) SLIGRL-NH(2) and 2-furoyl-LIGRLO-NH(2) caused both an endothelium-dependent relaxation and an endothelium-independent contraction. Relaxation was caused at peptide concentrations 10-fold lower than those causing a contractile response. Although trans-cinnamoyl-LIGRLO-NH(2), like other PAR(2)-APs, caused relaxation, it was inactive as a contractile agonist and instead antagonized the contractile response to SLIGRL-NH(2). RT-PCR-based sequencing of canine PAR(2) revealed a cleavage/activation (indicated by underlines) sequence (SKGR/SLIGKTDSSLQITGKG) that is very similar to the human PAR(2) sequence (R/SLIGKV). As a synthetic peptide, the canine PAR-AP (SLIGKT-NH(2)) was a much less potent agonist than either SLIGRL-NH(2) or 2-furoyl-LIGRLO-NH(2), either in the coronary contractile assay or in a Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell PAR(2) calcium signaling assay. In the MDCK signaling assay, the order of potencies was as follows: 2-furoyl-LIGRLO-NH(2) >> SLIGRL-NH(2) = trans-cinnamoyl-LIGRLO-NH(2) >> SLIGKT-NH(2), as expected for PAR(2) responses. In the coronary contractile assay, however, the order of potencies was very different: SLIGRL-NH(2) >> 2-furoyl-LIGRLO-NH(2) >> SLIGKT-NH(2), trans-cinnamoyl-LIGRLO-NH(2) = antagonist. Because of 1) the distinct agonist (relaxant) and antagonist (contractile) activity of trans-cinnamoyl-LIGRLO-NH(2) in the canine coronary contractile assays, 2) the different concentration ranges over which the peptides caused either relaxation or contraction in the same coronary preparation, and 3) the markedly distinct structure-activity profiles for the PAR-APs in the coronary contractile assay, compared with those for PAR(2)-mediated MDCK cell calcium signaling, we suggest that the canine coronary tissue possesses a receptor system for the PAR-APs that is distinct from PAR(2) itself.