Abdominal paravaginal defect repair in the treatment of paravaginal defect and urodynamic stress incontinence

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;27(6):601-4. doi: 10.1080/01443610701497603.

Abstract

We evaluated the morbidity, complications and outcomes in 42 patients who underwent abdominal paravaginal defect repair (PDR) for vaginal wall prolapse due to a paravaginal defect and the prolapse of other pelvic organs. Out of a total of the 42 patients, 32 underwent PDR and concomitant pelvic reconstructive procedures, and 10 patients underwent PDR plus anti-incontinence surgery and concomitant pelvic reconstructive procedures. The mean patient age was 44.5 years. The mean follow-up period was 40 months. One bladder injury and two hemorrhages occurred intraoperatively. The cure rate of anterior vaginal wall prolapse was 92.9%. Of the 20 patients with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) who underwent PDR alone, the rate of recurrence of USI was 20%; however, there was no recurrence in the 10 patients who underwent PDR plus the anti-incontinence procedures. Paravaginal repair is a safe and effective procedure for the surgical correction of a paravaginal defect, but has limited applicability in the surgical correction of USI.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / surgery*
  • Uterine Prolapse / surgery*
  • Vagina / surgery*