Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct;88(10):1314-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.764.

Predictive Validity and Responsiveness of the Functional Ambulation Category in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke

Affiliations

Predictive Validity and Responsiveness of the Functional Ambulation Category in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke

Jan Mehrholz et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the reliability, concurrent and predictive validity, and responsiveness of the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) in hemiparetic patients after stroke.

Design: Prospective cohort.

Setting: An early rehabilitation center for patients with neurologic disorders.

Participants: Fifty-five nonambulatory patients after first-ever stroke, with duration of illness between 30 and 60 days, were included.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: FAC, Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), walking velocity, step length, and six-minute walking test (6MWT) were assessed at the beginning, after 2 and 4 weeks of rehabilitation, and again 6 months later. After 6 months, community ambulation was also assessed. Test-retest and interrater reliability, concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity and responsiveness of the FAC were calculated.

Results: Based on video examinations, high test-retest reliability (Cohen kappa=.950) and interrater reliability (kappa=.905) were found. FAC scores at the beginning and after 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 6 months correlated highly with the RMI (Spearman rho=.686, rho=.787, rho=.825, rho=.893, respectively), distance walked in the 6MWT (rho=.949, rho=.937, rho=.931, rho=.906, respectively), walking velocity (rho=.952, rho=.939, rho=.902, rho=.901, respectively), and step length (rho=.952, rho=.932, rho=.896, rho=.877, respectively) at the same time points (all P<.001). The RMI, walking velocity, step length, and distance walked in the 6MWT differed for each FAC category (P<.001). After 4 weeks of rehabilitation, an FAC score of 4 or higher predicted community ambulation at 6 months with 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity. FAC scores changed significantly between the first 2 and second 2 weeks (Wilcoxon z=8.7, z=7.9, respectively; both P<.001) of the inpatient rehabilitation program.

Conclusions: The FAC has excellent reliability, good concurrent and predictive validity, and good responsiveness in patients with hemiparesis after stroke.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 68 articles

See all "Cited by" articles
Feedback