Histological patterns of bone and articular tissues after orthopaedic reconstructive surgery (artificial joint implants)

Pathol Res Pract. 1991 Dec;187(8):963-77. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(11)81068-X.

Abstract

Revision surgery after failures of joint replacements leads to histological studies on joint and bone tissues close to the implanted material. Aspectic loosening is the main complication. The surgical pathologist has to identify wear debris (metal, polyethylene, polymethylmethacrylate, chiefly) which promotes a histiocytic granuloma. Some surgical procedures such as cup or resurfacing arthroplasties create a new articular surface and a bone remodeling or necrosis. Cemented joint prostheses show various membrane structures between bone and the cement mantle while there is an association of bone resorption and formation. Non-cemented, porous-coated joint prostheses induce little bone ingrowth, even in satisfactory clinical results. Mechanical factors are predominant in massive limb prostheses. For silicone elastomer implants or artificial ligaments, wear of material promotes many tissular reactions. Often used bone grafts show little creeping substitution process in case of homografts, even well-incorporated on X-rays. More retrieval specimen studies are necessary to delineate precise topographical histological lesions, including non-loosened joint implants.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bone and Bones / pathology*
  • Bone and Bones / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Joint Prosthesis / adverse effects
  • Joints / pathology*
  • Joints / surgery*
  • Orthopedics / methods*
  • Prostheses and Implants / adverse effects