Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Feb 11;187(1):80-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.08.034. Epub 2007 Sep 4.

The contribution of ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to response reversal

Affiliations

The contribution of ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to response reversal

D G V Mitchell et al. Behav Brain Res. .

Abstract

Studies investigating response reversal consistently implicate regions of medial and lateral prefrontal cortex when reinforcement contingencies change. However, it is unclear from these studies how these regions give rise to the individual components of response reversal, such as reinforcement value encoding, response inhibition, and response change. Here we report a novel instrumental learning task designed to determine whether regions implicated in processing reversal errors are uniquely involved in this process, or whether they play a more general role in representing response competition, reinforcement value, or punishment value in the absence of demands for response change. In line with previous findings, reversal errors activated orbitofrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These regions also showed increased activity to errors in the absence of contingency changes. In addition, ventrolateral PFC, caudate, and dorsolateral PFC each exhibited increased activity following correct reversals. Activity in these regions was not significantly modulated by changes in reinforcement value that were not sufficient to make an alternative response advantageous. These data do not support punishment-processing or prepotent response inhibition accounts of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex function. Instead, they support recent conceptualizations of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex function that implicate this region in resolving response competition by manipulating the representation of either motor response options, or object features. These data also suggest that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a role in reversal learning, probably through top down attentional control of object or reinforcement features when task demands increase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The stock market task. One distinct stimulus type is shown. The “cheese” stock undergoes a change in value that makes response change advantageous (depicted in a-d). Each row represents a separate sample trial. a) Correct acquisition trial. Left: The response option screen shows the stock (cheese), and the current market value of the stock “Sell this stock now and lose $75.” Next to the current market value is the alternate response option: “Keep this stock and see if it grows.” In this case, the participant elected to keep the stock. Right: The feedback screen. Here the subject gained $50 instead of losing $75 as indicated by the updated red boxes, which show the value of the response just made (“By keeping this stock, you gained $50”), as well as the value of the forgone response (“You would have lost $75”). b) Acquisition error. Left: The subject chooses to sell the stock now and lose $75. Right: The feedback screen indicates that selling the stock cost the subject $75 whereas they would have gained $50 had they kept the stock. c) Reversal error. This sample depicts a stimulus that changes in valence of reinforcement and best response. Left: The subject chooses to keep the stock. However, this stimulus has undergone a reversal. Right: The feedback screen indicates that while selling the stock still costs the subject $75, keeping the stock now costs even more ($100). So in the reinforcement shift phase, this stimulus underwent a change of valence and best response (the value of keeping the stock went from a gain of $50 to a loss of $100 and the best response changed from keeping the stock to selling it). d) Correct reversal. Left: The subject now chooses to sell the stock. Right: The feedback screen reflects that the subject received a loss of only $75 by selling the stock versus the $100 loss that would have resulted from keeping it.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Images depicting significant activation in dorsomedial PFC, ventrolateral PFC, and caudate elicited by the contrast response reversal errors versus the control condition (p < 0.001, and p < 0.01 corrected). The conditions are abbreviated as follows: correct acquisition (Aq), correct control (Con), correct value change (VC), correct reversals (Rev), acquisition errors (AqErr), non-reversal errors (NRErr) and reversal errors (RevErr).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The graph depict the percent signal change across conditions within the region of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cools R, Clark L, Owen AM, Robbins TW. Defining the neural mechanisms of probabilistic reversal learning using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 2002;22(11):4563–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Remijnse PL, Nielen MM, Uylings HB, Veltman DJ. Neural correlates of a reversal learning task with an affectively neutral baseline: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2005;26(2):609–18. - PubMed
    1. O'Doherty J, Critchley H, Deichmann R, Dolan RJ. Dissociating valence of outcome from behavioral control in human orbital and ventral prefrontal cortices. J Neurosci. 2003;23(21):7931–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Budhani S, Marsh AA, Pine DS, Blair RJ. Neural correlates of response reversal: considering acquisition. Neuroimage. 2007;34(4):1754–1765. - PubMed
    1. Elliott R, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Dissociable functions in the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from human neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10(3):308–17. - PubMed

Publication types