The economic impact of clean indoor air laws
- PMID: 17989131
- DOI: 10.3322/CA.57.6.367
The economic impact of clean indoor air laws
Abstract
Clean indoor air laws are easily implemented, are well accepted by the public, reduce nonsmoker exposure to secondhand smoke, and contribute to a reduction in overall cigarette consumption. There are currently thousands of clean indoor air laws throughout the Unites States, and the majority of Americans live in areas where smoking is completely prohibited in workplaces, restaurants, or bars. The vast majority of scientific evidence indicates that there is no negative economic impact of clean indoor air policies, with many studies finding that there may be some positive effects on local businesses. This is despite the fact that tobacco industry-sponsored research has attempted to create fears to the contrary. Further progress in the diffusion of clean indoor air laws will depend on the continued documentation of the economic impact of clean indoor air laws, particularly within the hospitality industry. This article reviews the spread of clean indoor air laws, the effect on public health, and the scientific evidence of the economic impact of implementation of clean indoor air laws.
Similar articles
-
Preemptive state smoke-free indoor air laws--United States, 1999-2004.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Mar 18;54(10):250-3. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005. PMID: 15772586
-
Indoor air quality in hospitality venues before and after implementation of a clean indoor air law--Western New York, 2003.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Nov 12;53(44):1038-41. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004. PMID: 15538318
-
After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand.Tob Control. 2008 Feb;17(1):e2. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.020347. Tob Control. 2008. PMID: 18218788
-
The diffusion and impact of clean indoor air laws.Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:171-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090920. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008. PMID: 18348710 Review.
-
The impact of tobacco use and secondhand smoke on hospitality workers.Clin Occup Environ Med. 2006;5(1):31-42, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.coem.2005.10.005. Clin Occup Environ Med. 2006. PMID: 16446252 Review.
Cited by
-
Smoking prevalence and trends among a U.S. national sample of women of reproductive age in rural versus urban settings.PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207818. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30485376 Free PMC article.
-
Customers' Perceptions of Compliance with a Tobacco Control Law in Restaurants in Hanoi, Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 10;15(7):1451. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071451. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29996487 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of US smoke-free air laws on restaurants and bars by employer size: a panel study.BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 25;7(11):e018137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018137. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29175887 Free PMC article.
-
Smoke-Free Laws and Hazardous Drinking: A Cross-Sectional Study among U.S. Adults.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 13;14(4):412. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040412. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28406443 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco policies and on-premise smoking in bars and clubs that cater to young African Americans following the Maryland Clean Indoor Air Act of 2007.J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2017 Jul-Sep;16(3):328-343. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2016.1196631. Epub 2016 Jul 12. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2017. PMID: 27403708 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
