Purpose: To retrospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), PET, conventional imaging, and combined PET/CT and conventional imaging for tumor staging of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, by using histologic or follow-up imaging findings as the reference standard.
Materials and methods: Institutional review board approval was received for this HIPAA-compliant study; informed consent was obtained. Integrated PET/CT was performed in 117 patients (69 male patients, 48 female patients; mean age, 42 years +/- 21 [standard deviation]; range, 9-86 years). Conventional imaging consisted of magnetic resonance imaging of the primary site, chest radiography, whole-body contrast material-enhanced CT, and bone scintigraphy. A total of four reviewers assessed all images. Overall and T staging were evaluated in 69 (59%) patients who underwent surgical removal of the primary tumors and had pathologically proved results. N and M staging were evaluated in all patients, and their reference methods were based on histologic findings (n = 101) and follow-up CT findings (n = 16).
Results: Interpretations based on combined PET/CT and conventional imaging findings correctly staged tumors in 60 (87%) of 69 patients, overstaged tumors in eight (12%) patients, and understaged tumors in one (1%) patient. Overall staging accuracy of combined PET/CT and conventional imaging was significantly higher than that at PET (P < .0001). Combined PET/CT and conventional imaging resulted in correct N staging in 114 (97%) of 117 patients and M staging in 109 (93%) of 117 patients. Combined PET/CT and conventional imaging helped reduce overstaging in three (4%) patients and helped change tumor diagnosis from unresectable to resectable in two (2%) patients compared with PET/CT.
Conclusion: The combination of PET/CT and conventional imaging is accurate in preoperative staging of bone and soft-tissue sarcoma.
(c) RSNA, 2007.