Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Nov 20;147(10):685-92.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-10-200711200-00004.

Lumbar supports to prevent recurrent low back pain among home care workers: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Lumbar supports to prevent recurrent low back pain among home care workers: a randomized trial

Pepijn D D M Roelofs et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: People use lumbar supports to prevent low back pain. Secondary analyses from primary preventive studies suggest benefit among workers with previous low back pain, but definitive studies on the effectiveness of supports for the secondary prevention of low back pain are lacking.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of lumbar supports in the secondary prevention of low back pain.

Design: Randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: Home care organization in the Netherlands.

Patients: 360 home care workers with self-reported history of low back pain.

Intervention: Short course on healthy working methods, with or without patient-directed use of 1 of 4 types of lumbar support.

Measurements: Primary outcomes were the number of days of low back pain and sick leave over 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the average severity of low back pain and function (Quebec Back Pain Disability scale) in the previous week.

Results: Over 12 months, participants in the lumbar support group reported an average of -52.7 days (CI, -59.6 to -45.1 days) fewer days with low back pain than participants who received only the short course. However, the total sick days in the lumbar support group did not decrease (-5 days [CI, -21.1 to 6.8 days]). Small but statistically significant differences in pain intensity and function favored lumbar support.

Limitations: Study participants were unblinded, and a substantial amount of missing data required imputation. Objective data on sick days due to low back pain were not available.

Conclusion: Adding patient-directed use of lumbar supports to a short course on healthy working methods may reduce the number of days when low back pain occurs, but not overall work absenteeism, among home care workers with previous low back pain. Further study of lumbar supports is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Summary for patients in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources