Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;396:59-70.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-515-2_5.

InterPro and InterProScan: Tools for Protein Sequence Classification and Comparison

InterPro and InterProScan: Tools for Protein Sequence Classification and Comparison

Nicola Mulder et al. Methods Mol Biol. .

Abstract

Protein sequence classification and comparison has become increasingly important in the current "omics" revolution, where scientists are working on functional genomics and proteomics technologies for large-scale protein function prediction. However, functional classification is also important for the bench scientist wanting to analyze single or small sets of proteins, or even a single genome. A number of tools are available for sequence classification, such as sequence similarity searches, motif- or pattern-finding software, and protein signatures for identifying protein families and domains. One such tool, InterPro, is a documentation resource that integrates the major players in the protein signature field to provide a valuable tool for annotation of proteins. Protein sequences are searched using the InterProScan software to identify signatures from the InterPro member databases; Pfam, PROSITE, PRINTS, ProDom, SMART, TIGRFAMs, PIRSF, SUPERFAMILY, Gene3D, and PANTHER. The InterPro database can be searched to retrieve precalculated matches for UniProtKB proteins, or to find additional information on protein families and domains. For completely sequenced genomes, the user can retrieve InterPro-based analyses on all nonredundant proteins in the proteome, and can execute user-selected proteome comparisons. This chapter will describe how to use InterPro and InterProScan for protein sequence classification and comparative proteomics.

Similar articles

  • InterPro, progress and status in 2005.
    Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bradley P, Bork P, Bucher P, Cerutti L, Copley R, Courcelle E, Das U, Durbin R, Fleischmann W, Gough J, Haft D, Harte N, Hulo N, Kahn D, Kanapin A, Krestyaninova M, Lonsdale D, Lopez R, Letunic I, Madera M, Maslen J, McDowall J, Mitchell A, Nikolskaya AN, Orchard S, Pagni M, Ponting CP, Quevillon E, Selengut J, Sigrist CJ, Silventoinen V, Studholme DJ, Vaughan R, Wu CH. Mulder NJ, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jan 1;33(Database issue):D201-5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki106. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005. PMID: 15608177 Free PMC article.
  • New developments in the InterPro database.
    Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bork P, Buillard V, Cerutti L, Copley R, Courcelle E, Das U, Daugherty L, Dibley M, Finn R, Fleischmann W, Gough J, Haft D, Hulo N, Hunter S, Kahn D, Kanapin A, Kejariwal A, Labarga A, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Lonsdale D, Lopez R, Letunic I, Madera M, Maslen J, McAnulla C, McDowall J, Mistry J, Mitchell A, Nikolskaya AN, Orchard S, Orengo C, Petryszak R, Selengut JD, Sigrist CJ, Thomas PD, Valentin F, Wilson D, Wu CH, Yeats C. Mulder NJ, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D224-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl841. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007. PMID: 17202162 Free PMC article.
  • InterPro protein classification.
    McDowall J, Hunter S. McDowall J, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;694:37-47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-977-2_3. Methods Mol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21082426
  • In silico characterization of proteins: UniProt, InterPro and Integr8.
    Mulder NJ, Kersey P, Pruess M, Apweiler R. Mulder NJ, et al. Mol Biotechnol. 2008 Feb;38(2):165-77. doi: 10.1007/s12033-007-9003-x. Epub 2007 Oct 4. Mol Biotechnol. 2008. PMID: 18219596 Review.
  • Searching for hypothetical proteins: theory and practice based upon original data and literature.
    Lubec G, Afjehi-Sadat L, Yang JW, John JP. Lubec G, et al. Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Sep-Oct;77(1-2):90-127. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Nov 4. Prog Neurobiol. 2005. PMID: 16271823 Review.
See all similar articles

Cited by 161 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback