Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Dec;46(12):1814-8.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem233.

A Population-Based Assessment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Incidence and Prevalence--Results and Implications of Using Administrative Data for Epidemiological Studies

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Population-Based Assessment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Incidence and Prevalence--Results and Implications of Using Administrative Data for Epidemiological Studies

S Bernatsky et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate (i) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) incidence and prevalence using multiple sources of population-based administrative data; (ii) the sensitivity and specificity of case ascertainment methods; and (iii) variation in performance of each ascertainment approach, according to patient and physician characteristics.

Methods: We examined the physician billing and hospitalization databases of the province of Quebec (1994-2003) covering all health care beneficiaries (approximately 7.5 million). We compared various approaches to ascertain SLE cases, using information from each database separately or combining sources; we then estimated the sensitivity and specificity of these alternative approaches. We used regression models to determine if sensitivity was independently influenced by patient or physician characteristics.

Results: Using billing data, we calculated SLE incidence at 3.0/100,000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-3.4]; prevalence was 32.8/100,000 persons, in 2003. Results were similar using hospitalization data. However, only a proportion of prevalent cases were identified as having SLE by both methods. Combining cases from billing and hospitalization data, we found a prevalence of 51/100,000 in 2003. Our latent class regression model estimated a prevalence of 44.7/100,000 (95% CI 37.4-54.7). We found high specificity for SLE diagnoses across all strategies and data sources; sensitivity ranged from 42.1% to 67.6%, and was independently influenced by both patient and physician characteristics.

Conclusions: In observational studies, particularly with administrative databases, SLE incidence and prevalence estimates differ considerably, according to the approach for case ascertainment. In the absence of gold standards, statistical modelling can provide sensitivity and specificity estimates for different approaches.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 32 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

Feedback