Aim: To determine the effects of the ratio of vasectomised (teaser) rams to ewe hoggets used prior to breeding on the breeding performance and pregnancy rate of ewe hoggets.
Methods: Romney-composite ewe hoggets (n=1,180), 7-8 months of age, were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups (Day 1) and either exposed to harnessed teaser rams at a teaser-ram:ewe-hogget ratio of 1:32 (n=193 hoggets), 1:66 (n=199), 1:98 (n=197), or 1:197 (n=395), for 17 days prior to the breeding period, or not exposed to teasers (unteased; n=196). Harnessed entire rams were then introduced for the duration of two oestrous cycles (34 days). Using crayon marks, ewe hoggets were identified as having been mated during the first 17 days only, during the second 17 days only, during both 17-day periods, or not mated. Hoggets were weighed on Days 1 and 18. All ewe hoggets were scanned for pregnancy using ultrasound, 57 days after the end of the breeding period.
Results: Hogget groups did not differ in liveweight at Day 1, but at Day 18 hoggets exposed to teasers at a ratio of 1:66 were lighter, and those exposed to teasers at a ratio of 1:32 were heavier than all other groups by up 3.0 kg (p<0.05). Unteased ewe hoggets were less likely to be pregnant to the first 17 days of breeding compared with all teased groups, by at least 16.4% (p<0.05). Over the entire 34-day breeding period, however, only those teased at a ratio of 1:32 were more likely to be pregnant, by 11.9%, than unteased hoggets (p<0.05). Within the teased hogget groups, there were no differences between groups for either the percentage mated in the first 17 days of breeding only, or those pregnant to either the first 17 days of breeding only or the entire breeding period.
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that teaser-ram:ewe-hogget ratios as high as 1:197 can increase the percentage of ewe hoggets bred in the first 17 days of mating by at least 16.4%. Across the range of ratios used there was little difference in breeding pattern or pregnancy rate, although results might suggest ratios <or=1:32 are more effective compared with those >1:98.