Effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- PMID: 18071072
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.723411
Effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Abstract
Background: Previous animal and clinical studies suggest that bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation may be superior to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Our hypothesis was that both cardiac-only bystander resuscitation and conventional bystander CPR would improve outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of < or = 15 minutes' duration, whereas the addition of rescue breathing would improve outcomes for cardiac arrests lasting > 15 minutes.
Methods and results: We carried out a prospective, population-based, observational study involving consecutive patients with emergency responder resuscitation attempts from May 1, 1998, through April 30, 2003. The primary outcome measure was 1-year survival with favorable neurological outcome. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between type of CPR and outcomes. Among the 4902 witnessed cardiac arrests, 783 received conventional CPR, and 544 received cardiac-only resuscitation. Excluding very-long-duration cardiac arrests (> 15 minutes), the cardiac-only resuscitation yielded a higher rate of 1-year survival with favorable neurological outcome than no bystander CPR (4.3% versus 2.5%; odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.95), and conventional CPR showed similar effectiveness (4.1%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.60). For the very-long-duration arrests, neurologically favorable 1-year survival was greater in the conventional CPR group, but there were few survivors regardless of the type of bystander CPR (0.3% [2 of 624], 0% [0 of 92], and 2.2% [3 of 139] in the no bystander CPR, cardiac-only CPR, and conventional CPR groups, respectively; P<0.05).
Conclusions: Bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation and conventional CPR are similarly effective for most adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. For very prolonged cardiac arrests, the addition of rescue breathing may be of some help.
Comment in
-
Continuous-chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest.Circulation. 2007 Dec 18;116(25):2894-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.751065. Circulation. 2007. PMID: 18086938 No abstract available.
-
Letter by Lederer and Wiedermann regarding article, "effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest".Circulation. 2008 Jun 24;117(25):e508; author reply e509. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.761551. Circulation. 2008. PMID: 18574053 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of chest compression only and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore.Resuscitation. 2008 Aug;78(2):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 May 27. Resuscitation. 2008. PMID: 18502559
-
Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with public-access defibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.Circulation. 2012 Dec 11;126(24):2844-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.109504. Circulation. 2012. PMID: 23230315
-
Continuous improvements in "chain of survival" increased survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a large-scale population-based study.Circulation. 2009 Feb 10;119(5):728-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.802058. Epub 2009 Jan 26. Circulation. 2009. PMID: 19171854
-
Cardiac arrest care and emergency medical services in Canada.Can J Cardiol. 2004 Sep;20(11):1081-90. Can J Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 15457303 Review.
-
Out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest: an epidemiologic review and assessment of current knowledge.Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;46(6):512-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.05.028. Epub 2005 Aug 8. Ann Emerg Med. 2005. PMID: 16308066 Review.
Cited by
-
External Validation of Updated Prediction Models for Neurological Outcomes at 90 Days in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e033824. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033824. Epub 2024 May 3. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38700024 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Updating the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines on Out-of-Hospital Shockable Cardiac Arrest: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Japan.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e031394. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031394. Epub 2024 Feb 16. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38362855 Free PMC article.
-
Overview and future prospects of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registries in Japan.Resusc Plus. 2024 Feb 10;17:100578. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100578. eCollection 2024 Mar. Resusc Plus. 2024. PMID: 38362506 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Knowledge and willingness of schoolteachers in Jordan to perform CPR: a cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 8;13(8):e073080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073080. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37553198 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Riyadh province, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 22;10:1192795. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1192795. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37283580 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
