Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 22 (8), 1826-31

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration After Failed Endoscopic Stone Extraction


Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration After Failed Endoscopic Stone Extraction

Constantine Karaliotas et al. Surg Endosc.


Background: Our objective was to present the technical aspects and results of laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration following failed endoscopic stone extraction.

Method: From April 1997 to December 2006, 32 patients were referred to us after unsuccessful attempts at endoscopic CBD stone extraction. Transcholedochal laparoscopic CBD exploration was used in all patients. Previous operations, several pathologic entities, and stone impaction were studied as potential predictors of failure of the laparoscopic approach.

Results: Previous operations, cholangitis, anatomic abnormalities, and stone impaction were the principal reasons for failure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Stone extraction under direct laparoscopic choledochotomy was achieved in 20 of 31 patients (64.51%). Biliary stents were inserted in 7 patients (21.8%) and T tubes were placed in 21 patients (65.6%). Five laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomies were performed. There were 11 conversions to open surgery. Morbidity was 12.5%.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic choledochotomy is an efficacious procedure in dealing with unsuccessful endoscopic CBD clearance.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 17 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. Minerva Chir. 2002 Aug;57(4):467-74 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1998 Jan 17;351(9097):159-61 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1968 May;167(5):752-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jan;94(1):144-8 - PubMed
    1. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1974 Mar 15;99(11):496-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources