A comparison of the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy between HIV- and non-HIV-infected subjects with hyperlipidaemia

Int J STD AIDS. 2007 Dec;18(12):851-5. doi: 10.1258/095646207782716974.

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study conducted at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center evaluated the effectiveness and safety of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in a HIV-infected population as compared with a general population with hyperlipidaemia. Fifty-three HIV-infected subjects who developed dyslipidaemia and 53 age-matched non-HIV-infected subjects receiving LLT were selected. Efficacy of LLT was assessed after three and six months. Non-HIV-infected subjects were more likely to achieve total cholesterol (TC) goals at three and six months (P = 0.045, P = 0.005) and triglyceride (TG) goals at six months (P = 0.017). Less than 45% of HIV-infected subjects met National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) goals at three or six months. While non-HIV-infected subjects were more likely to achieve TC and TG goals than HIV-infected subjects, overall achievement of NCEP III goals was poor. This result was likely due to treatment with inappropriately low doses of statins.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cholesterol / blood
  • Clofibric Acid / therapeutic use
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Fish Oils / therapeutic use
  • HIV Infections / complications*
  • Humans
  • Hyperlipidemias / drug therapy*
  • Hypolipidemic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pravastatin / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Triglycerides / blood

Substances

  • Fish Oils
  • Hypolipidemic Agents
  • Triglycerides
  • Clofibric Acid
  • Cholesterol
  • Pravastatin