Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 18073360
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2644
Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Context: Lorazepam is currently recommended for sustained sedation of mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but this and other benzodiazepine drugs may contribute to acute brain dysfunction, ie, delirium and coma, associated with prolonged hospital stays, costs, and increased mortality. Dexmedetomidine induces sedation via different central nervous system receptors than the benzodiazepine drugs and may lower the risk of acute brain dysfunction.
Objective: To determine whether dexmedetomidine reduces the duration of delirium and coma in mechanically ventilated ICU patients while providing adequate sedation as compared with lorazepam.
Design, setting, patients, and intervention: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 106 adult mechanically ventilated medical and surgical ICU patients at 2 tertiary care centers between August 2004 and April 2006. Patients were sedated with dexmedetomidine or lorazepam for as many as 120 hours. Study drugs were titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation, measured using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Patients were monitored twice daily for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU).
Main outcome measures: Days alive without delirium or coma and percentage of days spent within 1 RASS point of the sedation goal.
Results: Sedation with dexmedetomidine resulted in more days alive without delirium or coma (median days, 7.0 vs 3.0; P = .01) and a lower prevalence of coma (63% vs 92%; P < .001) than sedation with lorazepam. Patients sedated with dexmedetomidine spent more time within 1 RASS point of their sedation goal compared with patients sedated with lorazepam (median percentage of days, 80% vs 67%; P = .04). The 28-day mortality in the dexmedetomidine group was 17% vs 27% in the lorazepam group (P = .18) and cost of care was similar between groups. More patients in the dexmedetomidine group (42% vs 31%; P = .61) were able to complete post-ICU neuropsychological testing, with similar scores in the tests evaluating global cognitive, motor speed, and attention functions. The 12-month time to death was 363 days in the dexmedetomidine group vs 188 days in the lorazepam group (P = .48).
Conclusion: In mechanically ventilated ICU patients managed with individualized targeted sedation, use of a dexmedetomidine infusion resulted in more days alive without delirium or coma and more time at the targeted level of sedation than with a lorazepam infusion.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00095251.
Comment in
-
Sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam in mechanically ventilated patients.JAMA. 2008 Apr 2;299(13):1540-1; author reply 1542. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.13.1540-b. JAMA. 2008. PMID: 18387926 No abstract available.
-
Sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam in mechanically ventilated patients.JAMA. 2008 Apr 2;299(13):1540; author reply 1542. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.13.1540-a. JAMA. 2008. PMID: 18387927 No abstract available.
-
Sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam in mechanically ventilated patients.JAMA. 2008 Apr 2;299(13):1541-2; author reply 1542. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.13.1541. JAMA. 2008. PMID: 18387928 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial.JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19188334 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial.Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R38. doi: 10.1186/cc8916. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 20233428 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical sedation scores as indicators of sedative and analgesic drug exposure in intensive care unit patients.Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):218-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.005. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007. PMID: 17996661
-
Delirium and sedation in the ICU.Neurocrit Care. 2011 Jun;14(3):463-74. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9520-0. Neurocrit Care. 2011. PMID: 21360232 Review.
-
Benzodiazepine versus nonbenzodiazepine-based sedation for mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9 Suppl 1):S30-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a16898. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23989093 Review.
Cited by
-
INhaled Sedation versus Propofol in REspiratory failure in the Intensive Care Unit (INSPiRE-ICU1): protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 26;14(10):e086946. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086946. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39461861 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Current Evidence Regarding the Evaluation and Management of Neonatal Delirium.Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01550-z. Online ahead of print. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024. PMID: 39446295 Review.
-
[What is confirmed in the treatment of sepsis? : An update].Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Sep 25. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01794-0. Online ahead of print. Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024. PMID: 39320478 Review. German.
-
Perioperative dexmedetomidine-induced delirium in a patient with schizophrenia: a case report.BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02670-y. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 39123151 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping Theme Trends and Research Frontiers in Dexmedetomidine Over Past Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Jul 16;18:3043-3061. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S459431. eCollection 2024. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024. PMID: 39050803 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
