Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jan-Feb;43(1):1-40.
doi: 10.1080/13682820601116485.

Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI)

Jeffry A Coady  1 , Julia L Evans
Affiliations
Review

Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI)

Jeffry A Coady et al. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background: The non-word repetition task (NRT) has gained wide acceptance in describing language acquisition in both children with normal language development (NL) and children with specific language impairments (SLI). This task has gained wide acceptance because it so closely matches the phonological component of word learning, and correlates with measures of phonological working memory, a deficit in which is hypothesized to underlie SLI.

Aims/methods & procedures: Recent uses of the NRT seem to accept it as a measure of phonological working memory capacity in spite of the fact that researchers have consistently acknowledged that the task taps many language processes, including speech perception, phonological encoding, phonological memory, phonological assembly and articulation. This paper reviews the literature on the use of the non-word repetition task (NRT) in children with NL and children with SLI, emphasizing the component skills necessary for successful repetition.

Main contribution: For children with NL, discussion has focused on (1) the relationship between non-word repetition ability and vocabulary, and (2) lexical and sublexical influences on repetition accuracy. For children with SLI, discussion has focused on these factors as well, but has also considered other component skills that support non-word repetition. Researchers have examined speech perception and discrimination, phonological encoding, phonological memory, phonological assembly, motor planning, and articulation, and have found evidence that children with SLI exhibit impairments in each of these supporting skills.

Conclusions: Because repetition accuracy depends on lexical and sublexical properties, the NRT can be used to examine the structural properties of the lexicon in both children with NL and with SLI. Further, because the task taps so many underlying skills, it is a powerful tool that can be used to identify children with language impairments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adams A-M, Gathercole SE. Phonological working memory and speech production in preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1995;38:403–414. - PubMed
    1. Adams A-M, Gathercole SE. Phonological working memory and spoken language development in young children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1996;49A:216–233.
    1. Adams A-M, Gathercole SE. Limitations in working memory: implications for language development. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 2000;35:95–116. - PubMed
    1. Alt M, Plante E. Factors that influence lexical and semantic fast mapping of young children with specific language impairment. Journal of speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2006;49:941–954. - PubMed
    1. Aslin RN, Jusczyk PW, Pisoni DB. Speech and auditory processing during infancy: constraints on and precursors to language. In: Kuhn D, Siegler R, editors. Handbook of Child Psychology: Cognition, Perception, and Language. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Wiley; 1998. pp. 147–198.