Perceived risk of prenatal diagnostic procedure-related miscarriage and Down syndrome among pregnant women
- PMID: 18177830
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.045
Perceived risk of prenatal diagnostic procedure-related miscarriage and Down syndrome among pregnant women
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to identify correlates of perceived risk of carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus or experiencing a procedure-related miscarriage among a diverse group of pregnant women.
Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1081 English-, Spanish-, or Chinese-speaking women receiving prenatal care in the San Francisco Bay area. Perceived risk of procedure-related miscarriage or carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus was assessed using a linear rating scale from 0 (no risk) to 1 (high risk). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to explore associations between maternal characteristics including age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status and perceived risks of carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus or experiencing a procedure-related miscarriage.
Results: Women aged 35 years old or older had a higher perceived risk of Down syndrome than younger women (0.28 vs 0.22 on a scale from 0 to 1, P < .001) but a lower perceived risk of a procedure-related miscarriage (0.31 vs 0.36, P = .004). In multivariable linear regression analysis among women younger than age 35 years, the perceived risk of carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus was higher in women who had not attended college (+0.06, P = .019) or had poor self-perceived health status (+0.08, P = .045). Latinas (+0.11, P = .008), women with an annual income less than $35,000 (+0.09, P = .003), and those who had difficulty conceiving (+0.09, P = .026) had higher perceived procedure-related miscarriage risk. Among women aged 35 years or older, perceived risk of carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus was associated with the inclination to undergo prenatal diagnosis.
Conclusion: Women's perceived risks of carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus or having a procedure-related miscarriage are associated with numerous characteristics that have not been shown to be associated with the actual risks of these events. These perceived risks are associated with prenatal diagnostic test inclination. Understanding patients' risk perceptions and effectively communicating risk is critical to helping patients make informed decisions regarding use of invasive prenatal testing.
Similar articles
-
Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff?Prenat Diagn. 2002 Dec;22(13):1195-200. doi: 10.1002/pd.494. Prenat Diagn. 2002. PMID: 12478632
-
The utility assessment of Chinese pregnant women towards the birth of a baby with Down syndrome compared to a procedure-related miscarriage.Prenat Diagn. 2006 Sep;26(9):819-24. doi: 10.1002/pd.1511. Prenat Diagn. 2006. PMID: 16832829
-
Miscarriage after invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures: how much risk our pregnant women are willing to take?Prenat Diagn. 2009 Sep;29(9):870-4. doi: 10.1002/pd.2305. Prenat Diagn. 2009. PMID: 19499531
-
Decision making following a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: an integrative review.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;57(2):156-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00109.x. Epub 2012 Feb 3. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012. PMID: 22432488 Review.
-
Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of diagnostic radiation exposures during and before pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;200(1):4-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.032. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19121655 Review.
Cited by
-
Do online decision aids reflect new prenatal screening and testing options? An environmental scan and content analysis.PEC Innov. 2022 Apr 14;1:100038. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100038. eCollection 2022 Dec. PEC Innov. 2022. PMID: 37213778 Free PMC article.
-
Differential expression profile study and gene function analysis of maternal foetal-derived circRNA for screening for Down's syndrome.Exp Ther Med. 2020 Feb;19(2):1006-1016. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8288. Epub 2019 Dec 5. Exp Ther Med. 2020. PMID: 32010263 Free PMC article.
-
Trait anxiety, information modality, and responses to communications about prenatal genetic testing.J Behav Med. 2014 Oct;37(5):988-99. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9555-8. Epub 2014 Jan 31. J Behav Med. 2014. PMID: 24481564 Clinical Trial.
-
Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2175-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID: 23215555 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The scope of prenatal diagnosis for women at increased risk for aneuploidies: views and preferences of professionals and potential users.J Community Genet. 2013 Jan;4(1):125-35. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0126-9. Epub 2012 Nov 9. J Community Genet. 2013. PMID: 23138342 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
