MBL or CLL: which classification best categorizes the clinical course of patients with an absolute lymphocyte count >or= 5 x 10(9) L(-1) but a B-cell lymphocyte count <5 x 10(9) L(-1)?

Leuk Res. 2008 Sep;32(9):1458-61. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.11.030. Epub 2008 Jan 7.

Abstract

To eliminate overlap with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL), some have proposed basing the diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) on B lymphocyte count rather than absolute lymphocyte count (ALC). Such criteria should be based, in part, on patient outcomes. We evaluated the clinical implications of the proposed re-classification in 112 consecutive, newly diagnosed, Rai stage 0 patients. The new criteria would have changed the diagnosis from CLL to MBL in 47/112 (42%) patients. There was no difference in time to treatment (TTT) between those classified as MBL and CLL under the new criteria. In contrast, CD38 predicted TTT (p=0.02) regardless of the proposed new classification. Molecular characteristics of the leukemic clone are a better predictor of progression than an arbitrary ALC or B lymphocyte count threshold.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • B-Lymphocytes / pathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell / classification*
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell / pathology
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell / therapy
  • Lymphocyte Count*
  • Lymphocytosis / classification*
  • Lymphocytosis / pathology
  • Lymphocytosis / therapy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Survival Rate
  • Time Factors