Detecting patient allergy: beware the LIE

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Sep;89(6):603-4. doi: 10.1308/003588407X187711.

Abstract

Introduction: Allergy detection is important in surgical patients. Historically, the focus has been on drug allergies. There is increasing focus on non-drug allergy, specifically latex, iodine and elastoplast.

Patients and methods: The practice and knowledge of 24 pre-registration house officers was evaluated, with regard to patient allergy. For the second phase of the study, the cohort of 367 consecutive patients presenting to the orthopaedic pre-assessment clinic was prospectively assessed.

Results: This prospective study demonstrates that standard history-taking misses a large number (38%) of such allergies.

Conclusions: With regard to allergy detection, we are living a LIE (by ignoring latex, iodine, elastoplast allergy). We suggest junior doctors should employ the mnemonic LIED (latex, iodine, elastoplast and drugs) when taking a medical history.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / adverse effects
  • Bandages / adverse effects
  • Clinical Competence / standards*
  • Disclosure
  • Drug Hypersensitivity / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Hypersensitivity / diagnosis*
  • Iodine / adverse effects
  • Latex Hypersensitivity / diagnosis
  • Medical Staff, Hospital / standards*
  • Prospective Studies

Substances

  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local
  • Iodine