The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation
- PMID: 18207117
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.12.002
The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation
Abstract
Previous studies of multisensory integration have often stressed the beneficial effects that may arise when information concerning an event arrives via different sensory modalities at the same time, as, for example, exemplified by research on the redundant target effect (RTE). By contrast, studies of the Colavita visual dominance effect (e.g., [Colavita, F. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 409-412]) highlight the inhibitory consequences of the competition between signals presented simultaneously in different sensory modalities instead. Although both the RTE and the Colavita effect are thought to occur at early sensory levels and the stimulus conditions under which they are typically observed are very similar, the interplay between these two opposing behavioural phenomena (facilitation vs. competition) has yet to be addressed empirically. We hypothesized that the dissociation may reflect two of the fundamentally different ways in which humans can perceive concurrent auditory and visual stimuli. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated both multisensory facilitation (RTE) and the Colavita visual dominance effect using exactly the same audiovisual displays, by simply changing the task from a speeded detection task to a speeded modality discrimination task. Meanwhile, in Experiment 2, the participants exhibited multisensory facilitation when responding to visual targets and multisensory inhibition when responding to auditory targets while keeping the task constant. These results therefore indicate that both multisensory facilitation and inhibition can be demonstrated in reaction to the same bimodal event.
Similar articles
-
Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.Brain Res. 2007 Dec;1186:224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.076. Epub 2007 Oct 5. Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 18005944
-
Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing.Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):523-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Feb 28. Neuropsychologia. 2007. PMID: 16504220
-
Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.Neurosci Lett. 2007 May 1;417(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.069. Epub 2007 Feb 15. Neurosci Lett. 2007. PMID: 17408855
-
Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect.Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:245-58. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17615-X. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19733761 Review.
-
Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):971-95. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011. PMID: 21264748 Review.
Cited by
-
Semantic congruency modulates the speed-up of multisensory responses.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50674-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38177170 Free PMC article.
-
Crossmodal interference on counting performance: Evidence for shared attentional resources.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 10;18(11):e0294057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294057. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37948407 Free PMC article.
-
Attentional focusing and filtering in multisensory categorization.Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Sep 6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02370-7. Online ahead of print. Psychon Bull Rev. 2023. PMID: 37673842
-
Keep your finger on the pulse: Better rate perception and gap detection with vibrotactile compared to visual stimuli.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):2004-2017. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02736-y. Epub 2023 Aug 16. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023. PMID: 37587355 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of audiovisual interactions on working memory: Use of the combined N-back + Go/NoGo paradigm.Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 17;14:1080788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080788. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36874804 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
