The risk we bear: the effects of review speed and industry user fees on new drug safety
- PMID: 18207263
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.10.007
The risk we bear: the effects of review speed and industry user fees on new drug safety
Abstract
Drug review speed has increased substantially in the 1990s, largely due to industry-funded user fees. Following several drug withdrawals, however, new questions have emerged about the effects of this change on drug safety. This article examines the impact of review speed and user fees on counts of serious adverse reactions among drugs approved in 1990-2001. The analysis controls for the influence of drug utilization, patient conditions, drug novelty, black box warnings, foreign drug launch, US launch lags, patient age, and gender on drug reactions. Results show that drugs receiving faster reviews are associated with increased counts of serious adverse drug reactions. Other results show that novel drugs, drugs with black box warnings, drugs first launched abroad, and drugs with shorter US launch lags also have increased adverse drug reactions. Although any increase in risks must be weighed against benefits, the results show a trade-off between review speed and drug safety.
Similar articles
-
Drug-review deadlines and safety problems.N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 27;358(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0706341. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18367738
-
FDA boxed warnings: how to prescribe drugs safely.Am Fam Physician. 2010 Feb 1;81(3):298-303. Am Fam Physician. 2010. PMID: 20112888 Review.
-
Are novel drugs more risky for patients than less novel drugs?J Health Econ. 2004 Nov;23(6):1135-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.03.007. J Health Econ. 2004. PMID: 15556240
-
Canadian and US drug approval times and safety considerations.Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Oct;37(10):1403-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D110. Ann Pharmacother. 2003. PMID: 14519031
-
Cardiovascular safety of drugs not intended for cardiovascular use: need for a new conceptual basis for assessment and approval.Eur Heart J. 2007 Aug;28(15):1904-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm209. Epub 2007 Jul 5. Eur Heart J. 2007. PMID: 17615083 Review.
Cited by
-
Review time of oncology drugs and its underlying factors: an exploration in China.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 1;14:1151784. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1151784. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 38027001 Free PMC article.
-
Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01639-x. Epub 2023 Nov 14. Eur J Health Econ. 2024. PMID: 37962724 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unpacking the effects of adverse regulatory events: Evidence from pharmaceutical relabeling.Res Policy. 2021 Jan;50(1):104126. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104126. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Res Policy. 2021. PMID: 32952226 Free PMC article.
-
Review times and adverse events for cardiovascular devices.Nat Biomed Eng. 2017 Jan;1(1):0013. doi: 10.1038/s41551-016-0013. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Nat Biomed Eng. 2017. PMID: 31249727 Free PMC article.
-
Cost recovery by Health Canada and drug safety: a time-series analysis.CMAJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;6(4):E471-E477. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180146. Print 2018 Oct-Dec. CMAJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30337472 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
