Evaluation of safety and efficacy of variable pulsed light in the treatment of unwanted hair in 77 volunteers

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Mar;22(3):311-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02408.x.

Abstract

Background: Several studies on hair removal with intense pulsed light (IPL) and various laser sources have been done, but adequate data on long-term follow up are scarce. The present uncontrolled prospective pilot study evaluated safety and long-term efficacy of variable pulsed light (VPL) on hair removal in the face for medical and/or cosmetic indications.

Study design/material and methods: The VPL system (Energist Ltd, UK) was used for the treatment of hypertrichosis in the face, mainly hirsutism, in 77 female volunteers. The minimum follow-up time after the last treatment was 9 months (mean: 12.74 +/- 2.87 months).

Results: Over 50% of hair clearance was observed in 68 (88.3%) of all cases. Erythema and leucotrichia were the most often associated side-effects encountered. Transient pigmentary changes were not reported.

Conclusion: The VPL System presents as a relatively efficient and safe treatment alternative for long-term removal of unwanted hair. It seems to be particularly effective in fair-skinned patients with dark hair (skin types II-III-IV). Adverse effects were minimal and transient and, in no patient, significant enough to interrupt treatment.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Hair / growth & development
  • Hair / radiation effects*
  • Hair Removal / methods*
  • Hirsutism / therapy
  • Humans
  • Hypertrichosis / therapy*
  • Light*
  • Phototherapy / adverse effects
  • Phototherapy / methods*
  • Pilot Projects
  • Treatment Outcome