Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
- PMID: 18316791
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116
Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Panitumumab, a fully human antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has activity in a subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although activating mutations in KRAS, a small G-protein downstream of EGFR, correlate with poor response to anti-EGFR antibodies in mCRC, their role as a selection marker has not been established in randomized trials.
Patients and methods: KRAS mutations were detected using polymerase chain reaction on DNA from tumor sections collected in a phase III mCRC trial comparing panitumumab monotherapy to best supportive care (BSC). We tested whether the effect of panitumumab on progression-free survival (PFS) differed by KRAS status.
Results: KRAS status was ascertained in 427 (92%) of 463 patients (208 panitumumab, 219 BSC). KRAS mutations were found in 43% of patients. The treatment effect on PFS in the wild-type (WT) KRAS group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.59) was significantly greater (P < .0001) than in the mutant group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.36). Median PFS in the WT KRAS group was 12.3 weeks for panitumumab and 7.3 weeks for BSC. Response rates to panitumumab were 17% and 0%, for the WT and mutant groups, respectively. WT KRAS patients had longer overall survival (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.82; treatment arms combined). Consistent with longer exposure, more grade III treatment-related toxicities occurred in the WT KRAS group. No significant differences in toxicity were observed between the WT KRAS group and the overall population.
Conclusion: Panitumumab monotherapy efficacy in mCRC is confined to patients with WT KRAS tumors. KRAS status should be considered in selecting patients with mCRC as candidates for panitumumab monotherapy.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00113763 NCT00113776.
Republished in
-
Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 20;41(18):3278-3286. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02758. J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37315390
Comment in
-
Determinants of RASistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1582-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3700. Epub 2008 Mar 3. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18316790 Review. No abstract available.
-
Defining best supportive care.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 1;26(31):5139-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7491. Epub 2008 Oct 6. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18838696 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4706-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6055. Epub 2010 Oct 4. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20921462 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study.J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4697-705. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4860. Epub 2010 Oct 4. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20921465 Clinical Trial.
-
Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 20;41(18):3278-3286. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02758. J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37315390
-
PIK3CA exon 20 mutations as a potential biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Oncol. 2012 Jun;23(6):1518-25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr464. Epub 2011 Oct 29. Ann Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22039088 Review.
-
Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review.Clin Ther. 2010 Mar;32(3):437-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.03.012. Clin Ther. 2010. PMID: 20399983 Review.
Cited by
-
A comparison of three methods for detecting KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed colorectal cancer specimens.Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 10;107(2):345-51. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.259. Epub 2012 Jun 19. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22713664 Free PMC article.
-
Biologic determinants of tumor recurrence in stage II colon cancer: validation study of the 12-gene recurrence score in cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 9581.J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1775-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.1096. Epub 2013 Mar 25. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23530100 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic and predictive roles of KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2012 Sep 25;13(10):12153-68. doi: 10.3390/ijms131012153. Int J Mol Sci. 2012. PMID: 23202889 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, and NPV for Predictive Biomarkers.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jun 24;107(8):djv153. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv153. Print 2015 Aug. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 26109105 Free PMC article.
-
PLCε signaling in cancer.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;142(4):715-22. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1999-x. Epub 2015 Jun 25. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26109147 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous

