Health risks and benefits 3 years after stopping randomized treatment with estrogen and progestin
- PMID: 18319414
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1036
Health risks and benefits 3 years after stopping randomized treatment with estrogen and progestin
Abstract
Context: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial of estrogen plus progestin vs placebo was stopped early, after a mean 5.6 years of follow-up, because the overall health risks of hormone therapy exceeded its benefits.
Objective: To report health outcomes at 3 years (mean 2.4 years of follow-up) after the intervention was stopped.
Design, setting, and participants: The intervention phase was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) 0.625 mg daily plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 mg daily, in 16,608 women aged 50 through 79 years, recruited by 40 centers from 1993 to 1998. The postintervention phase commenced July 8, 2002, and included 15 730 women.
Main outcome measures: Semi-annual monitoring and outcomes ascertainment continued per trial protocol. The primary end points were coronary heart disease and invasive breast cancer. A global index summarizing the balance of risks and benefits included the 2 primary end points plus stroke, pulmonary embolism, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, and death due to other causes.
Results: The risk of cardiovascular events after the intervention was comparable by initial randomized assignments, 1.97% (annualized rate) in the CEE plus MPA (343 events) and 1.91% in the placebo group (323 events). A greater risk of malignancies occurred in the CEE plus MPA than in the placebo group (1.56% [n = 281] vs 1.26% [n = 218]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.48). More breast cancers were diagnosed in women who had been randomly assigned to receive CEE plus MPA vs placebo (0.42% [n = 79] vs 0.33% [n = 60]; HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.91-1.78) with a modest trend toward a lower HR during the follow-up after the intervention. All-cause mortality was somewhat higher in the CEE plus MPA than in the placebo group (1.20% [n = 233] vs 1.06% [n = 196]; HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.95-1.39). The global index of risks and benefits was unchanged from randomization through March 31, 2005 (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21), indicating that the risks of CEE plus MPA exceed the benefits for chronic disease prevention.
Conclusions: The increased cardiovascular risks in the women assigned to CEE plus MPA during the intervention period were not observed after the intervention. A greater risk of fatal and nonfatal malignancies occurred after the intervention in the CEE plus MPA group and the global risk index was 12% higher in women randomly assigned to receive CEE plus MPA compared with placebo.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000611.
Comment in
-
Colorectal cancer in women after stopping postmenopausal hormone therapy.JAMA. 2008 Jun 18;299(23):2744; author reply 2744-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.23.2744-a. JAMA. 2008. PMID: 18559997 No abstract available.
-
Risk for cancer was still increased over 2 years after stopping hormone therapy.ACP J Club. 2008 Aug 19;149(2):11. ACP J Club. 2008. PMID: 18710184 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women's Health Initiative randomized trials.JAMA. 2013 Oct 2;310(13):1353-68. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278040. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 24084921 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Conjugated equine estrogens and incidence of probable dementia and mild cognitive impairment in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study.JAMA. 2004 Jun 23;291(24):2947-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.24.2947. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15213206 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1701-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1701. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15082697 Clinical Trial.
-
New evidence regarding hormone replacement therapies is urgently required transdermal postmenopausal hormone therapy differs from oral hormone therapy in risks and benefits.Maturitas. 2005 Sep 16;52(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.05.003. Maturitas. 2005. PMID: 15963666 Review.
-
Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer: what is the evidence from randomized trials?Climacteric. 2018 Dec;21(6):521-528. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1514008. Epub 2018 Oct 9. Climacteric. 2018. PMID: 30296850 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tibolone and Breast Cancer.J Menopausal Med. 2023 Dec;29(3):92-96. doi: 10.6118/jmm.23032. J Menopausal Med. 2023. PMID: 38230592 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lung cancer in patients who have never smoked - an emerging disease.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb;21(2):121-146. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00844-0. Epub 2024 Jan 9. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38195910 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of menopausal hormone therapy in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Open Life Sci. 2023 Dec 12;18(1):20220759. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0759. eCollection 2023. Open Life Sci. 2023. PMID: 38152576 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Menopause Hormone Therapy and Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators.Indian J Orthop. 2023 Dec 7;57(Suppl 1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01071-6. eCollection 2023 Dec. Indian J Orthop. 2023. PMID: 38107817 Review.
-
The osteoporosis treatment gap in Switzerland between 1998 and 2018.Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Jan 18;18(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01206-6. Arch Osteoporos. 2023. PMID: 36650393 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
