Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 30 (5-6), 439-53; discussion 453-76

Précis of The Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Reality

Affiliations

Précis of The Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Reality

Ruth M J Byrne. Behav Brain Sci.

Abstract

The human imagination remains one of the last uncharted terrains of the mind. People often imagine how events might have turned out "if only" something had been different. The "fault lines" of reality, those aspects more readily changed, indicate that counterfactual thoughts are guided by the same principles as rational thoughts. In the past, rationality and imagination have been viewed as opposites. But research has shown that rational thought is more imaginative than cognitive scientists had supposed. In The Rational Imagination, I argue that imaginative thought is more rational than scientists have imagined. People exhibit remarkable similarities in the sorts of things they change in their mental representation of reality when they imagine how the facts could have turned out differently. For example, they tend to imagine alternatives to actions rather than inactions, events within their control rather than those beyond their control, and socially unacceptable events rather than acceptable ones. Their thoughts about how an event might have turned out differently lead them to judge that a strong causal relation exists between an antecedent event and the outcome, and their thoughts about how an event might have turned out the same lead them to judge that a weaker causal relation exists. In a simple temporal sequence, people tend to imagine alternatives to the most recent event. The central claim in the book is that counterfactual thoughts are organised along the same principles as rational thought. The idea that the counterfactual imagination is rational depends on three steps: (1) humans are capable of rational thought; (2) they make inferences by thinking about possibilities; and (3) their counterfactual thoughts rely on thinking about possibilities, just as rational thoughts do. The sorts of possibilities that people envisage explain the mutability of certain aspects of mental representations and the immutability of other aspects.

Similar articles

  • Thinking Within the Box: The Relational Processing Style Elicited by Counterfactual Mind-Sets
    LJ Kray et al. J Pers Soc Psychol 91 (1), 33-48. PMID 16834478.
    By comparing reality to what might have been, counterfactuals promote a relational processing style characterized by a tendency to consider relationships and associations …
  • Improving the Past and the Future: A Temporal Asymmetry in Hypothetical Thinking
    D Ferrante et al. J Exp Psychol Gen 142 (1), 23-7. PMID 22468671. - Randomized Controlled Trial
    Current views of hypothetical thinking implicitly assume that the content of imaginary thoughts about the past and future should be the same. Two experiments show that, g …
  • From What Might Have Been to What Must Have Been: Counterfactual Thinking Creates Meaning
    LJ Kray et al. J Pers Soc Psychol 98 (1), 106-18. PMID 20053036.
    Four experiments explored whether 2 uniquely human characteristics-counterfactual thinking (imagining alternatives to the past) and the fundamental drive to create meanin …
  • Counterfactual Thought
    RM Byrne. Annu Rev Psychol 67, 135-57. PMID 26393873. - Review
    People spontaneously create counterfactual alternatives to reality when they think "if only" or "what if" and imagine how the past could have been different. The mind com …
  • Thinking Is Believing
    R Kasturirangan. Prog Brain Res 168, 105-14. PMID 18166389. - Review
    Philosophers as well lay people often think of beliefs as psychological states with dubious epistemic properties. Beliefs are conceptualized as unregulated conceptual str …
See all similar articles

Cited by 29 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback