Patterns of alcohol consumption and alcohol-impaired driving in the United States
- PMID: 18341648
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00622.x
Patterns of alcohol consumption and alcohol-impaired driving in the United States
Abstract
Background: Alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes kill approximately 17,000 Americans annually and were associated with more than $51 billion in total costs in 2000. Relatively little is known about the drinking patterns of alcohol-impaired (AI) drivers in the United States.
Methods: 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) was analyzed for alcohol consumption and self-reported AI driving among U.S. adults aged > or =18 years for all states. Alcohol consumption was divided into 4 categories: binge/heavy, binge/nonheavy, nonbinge/heavy, and nonbinge/nonheavy. Binge drinking was defined as > or =5 drinks for men or > or =4 drinks for women on one or more occasions in the past month, and heavy drinking was defined as average daily consumption of >2 drinks/day (men) or >1 drink/day (women). The prevalence of AI driving was examined by drinking pattern and by demographic characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between drinking patterns and AI driving.
Results: Five percent of drinkers were engaged in AI driving during the past 30 days. Overall, 84% of AI drivers were binge drinkers and 88% of AI driving episodes involved binge drinkers. By drinking category, binge/nonheavy drinkers accounted for the largest percentage of AI drivers (49.4%), while binge/heavy drinkers accounted for the most episodes of AI driving (51.3%). The adjusted odds of AI driving were 20.1 (95% CI: 16.7, 24.3) for binge/heavy, 8.2 (6.9, 9.7) for binge/nonheavy, and 3.9 (2.4, 6.3) for nonbinge/heavy drinkers, respectively.
Conclusions: There is a strong association between binge drinking and AI driving. Most AI drivers and almost half of all AI driving episodes involve persons who are not heavy drinkers (based on average daily consumption). Implementing effective interventions to prevent binge drinking could substantially reduce AI driving.
Similar articles
-
The joint association of average volume of alcohol and binge drinking with hazardous driving behaviour and traffic crashes.Addiction. 2008 May;103(5):749-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02165.x. Addiction. 2008. PMID: 18412753
-
Binge drinking among U.S. active-duty military personnel.Am J Prev Med. 2009 Mar;36(3):208-17. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.10.017. Am J Prev Med. 2009. PMID: 19215846
-
Driving after binge drinking.Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):314-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.013. Am J Prev Med. 2009. PMID: 19765503
-
Acculturation and alcohol among Latino adults in the United States: a comprehensive review.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Dec;31(12):1968-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00532.x. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007. PMID: 18034692 Review.
-
International policies on alcohol impaired driving: are legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limits in motorized countries compatible with the scientific evidence?Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi. 2003 Apr;38(2):83-102. Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi. 2003. PMID: 12784660 Review.
Cited by
-
Drunk driving: a secondary analysis of factors associated with driving under the influence of alcohol in Jamaica.BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 12;13(7):e073529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073529. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37438070 Free PMC article.
-
Alcohol and Public Health: Failure and Opportunity.Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):552-578. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12631. Milbank Q. 2023. PMID: 37096612 Free PMC article.
-
Multilevel longitudinal relations among impulsive traits, positive expectancies, and binge drinking from late adolescence to adulthood: A developmental test of acquired preparedness.Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023 May;47(5):996-1009. doi: 10.1111/acer.15064. Epub 2023 Apr 19. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023. PMID: 36977505 Free PMC article.
-
Researching Mitigation of Alcohol Binge Drinking in Polydrug Abuse: KCNK13 and RASGRF2 Gene(s) Risk Polymorphisms Coupled with Genetic Addiction Risk Severity (GARS) Guiding Precision Pro-Dopamine Regulation.J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 20;12(6):1009. doi: 10.3390/jpm12061009. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35743793 Free PMC article.
-
Health outcomes in a national sample of American Indian and Alaska Native adults: Differences between multiple-race and single-race subgroups.PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0242934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242934. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33270688 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
