New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime

Physiol Behav. 2008 Jun 9;94(3):331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.01.022. Epub 2008 Feb 8.

Abstract

The present study tested the accuracy of probable-lie and directed-lie polygraph tests. One hundred and twenty men and women were recruited from the general community and paid $30 to participate in a mock crime experiment. Equal numbers of males and females were assigned to either the guilty or innocent condition with equal numbers in each group receiving either a probable-lie or a directed-lie polygraph test resulting in a 2 x 2 design with two experimental factors (test type and deceptive condition). Half of the participants were guilty and half were innocent of committing a mock theft of $20 from a purse. All participants were paid a $50 bonus if they could convince the polygraph examiner that they were innocent. There were no significant differences in decision accuracy between probable-lie and directed-lie tests, but respiration measures were more diagnostic for the probable-lie test. New physiological measures, skin potential excursion and a new respiratory measure improved the accuracy of the directed-lie test such that 86% of the innocent participants and 93% of the guilty participants were correctly classified.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Computer Simulation
  • Crime / psychology*
  • Criminal Psychology*
  • Deception*
  • Female
  • Guilt*
  • Humans
  • Lie Detection / psychology*
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Respiration
  • Sensitivity and Specificity