Demographic and socioeconomic trends in the use of laparoscopic appendectomy from 1997 to 2003
- PMID: 18424278
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.031
Demographic and socioeconomic trends in the use of laparoscopic appendectomy from 1997 to 2003
Abstract
Background: Because there is conflicting evidence regarding the benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy, we hypothesized that there would be measurable differences in its use among various socioeconomic groups and geographic areas.
Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for appendectomies performed between the years of 1997 and 2003. Rates of laparoscopic appendectomy were compared among hospital subtypes and demographic groups.
Results: The percentage of appendectomies performed laparoscopically has increased from 19.1% in 1997 to 37.9% in 2003. Only 11.8% of cases of complicated appendicitis were treated laparoscopically in 1997, compared with 23.5% in 2003. Nonwhite patients and those from low-income areas continue to be less likely to undergo laparoscopic appendectomy (P < .001).
Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that despite expanding use of laparoscopic appendectomy nationwide, patients who live in zip codes areas with a preponderance of minorities or low-income earners are more likely to have open appendectomy.
Similar articles
-
Insurance status and race represent independent predictors of undergoing laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis: secondary data analysis of 145,546 patients.J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Oct;199(4):567-75; discussion 575-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.06.023. J Am Coll Surg. 2004. PMID: 15454140
-
Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.Am J Surg. 2004 Dec;188(6):813-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.047. Am J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15619505
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017. J Am Coll Surg. 2007. PMID: 17617333
-
Laparoscopy utilization and outcomes for appendicitis in small children.J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Sep;48(9):1941-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.12.039. J Pediatr Surg. 2013. PMID: 24074672
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy: indications and controversies.Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002 Mar;9(1):32-9. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002. PMID: 11979408 Review.
Cited by
-
[S073]-The impact of interval appendectomy timing on follow-up adverse outcomes.Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3154-3161. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09517-y. Epub 2022 Aug 12. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 35962228
-
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30484855 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting recovery of postoperative bowel function after pediatric laparoscopic surgery.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul-Sep;32(3):369-75. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.168196. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27625488 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and outcomes in the utilization of laparoscopic appendectomies in a low-income population in Taiwan from 2003 to 2011.Int J Equity Health. 2015 Oct 24;14:100. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0248-x. Int J Equity Health. 2015. PMID: 26496832 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in the national distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies from 2003 to 2010.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Jan 24. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24462854 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
